Literature DB >> 3048088

Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma.

J R Harkess1, B A Gildon, P W Archer, G R Istre.   

Abstract

The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found to be far superior to reporting by physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3048088     DOI： 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN： 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Shaun Grannis; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Reporting of communicable diseases by university physicians.

Authors:  D Campos-Outcalt; R England; B Porter
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Conceptual framework of public health surveillance and action and its application in health sector reform.

Authors:  Scott J N McNabb; Stella Chungong; Mike Ryan; Tadesse Wuhib; Peter Nsubuga; Wondi Alemu; Vilma Carande-Kulis; Guenael Rodier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Multijurisdictional approach to biosurveillance, Kansas City.

Authors:  Mark A Hoffman; Tiffany H Wilkinson; Aaron Bush; Wayne Myers; Ron G Griffin; Gerald L Hoff; Rex Archer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.883
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.