Literature DB >> 30480820

Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument.

Perry Hendricks1.   

Abstract

Much of the debate about the ethics of abortion has centered on whether the fetus is a person. In an attempt to sidestep this complex issue, I argue that, even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral. To arrive at this conclusion, I argue that giving a fetus fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and that if this is so, then killing the fetus is immoral. Roughly, this is because killing the fetus impairs it more than giving it fetal alcohol syndrome. Since abortion (in most cases) amounts to killing the fetus, this means that abortion (in most cases) is immoral. I defend the premises of this argument against a plethora of objections, concluding that they either do not work, or commit their proponent to a controversial position.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abortion; fetal alcohol syndrome; impairment argument; personhood

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30480820     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  1 in total

1.  Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion.

Authors:  Bruce Philip Blackshaw; Perry Hendricks
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.