Literature DB >> 30480582

Is pericardial effusion a negative prognostic marker? Meta-analysis of outcomes of pericardial effusion.

Ovidio De Filippo1, Paolo Gatti1, Sara Rettegno1, Mario Iannaccone1, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo1, George Lazaros2, Antonio Brucato3, Dimitrios Tousoulis2, Yehuda Adler4, Massimo Imazio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance and the prevalence of pericardial effusion in several diseases are not well established. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the available evidence related to pericardial effusion prevalence and outcomes according to the cause.
METHODS: Articles investigating the prognosis of pericardial effusion were identified by literature search. Twenty-three studies were finally included (17 022 patients). All-cause mortality was the primary end-point. Secondary end-point was the prevalence of pericardial effusion in most common diseases related to this clinical condition.
RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of pericardial effusion was 19.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3-26]. After a mean follow-up of 36 ± 23 months, the risk of death was higher in pericardial effusion patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.59, 95% CI 1.37-1.85, P < 0.0001]. Stratifying for the main disease, pericardial effusion is associated with unfavourable outcome in all available subgroups: pulmonary arterial hypertension HR 1.53 (95% CI: 1.22-1.92; P < 0.0001), chronic heart failure (CHF) HR 1.53 (95% CI: 1.22-1.92; P < 0.0001), myocardial infarction HR 2.65 (95% CI: 1.4-4.99; P = 0.003) and malignancies HR 1.75 (95% CI: 1.09-2.81, P = 0.021). The lack of data concerning the idiopathic pericardial effusion does not permit a secure risk assessment but the average incidence of mortality is 14.5% (95% CI: 7.7-25.6).
CONCLUSION: Pericardial effusion should be considered a marker of the severity of the underlying disease, whereas for idiopathic pericardial effusion the correlation with poor prognosis is less clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30480582     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  5 in total

1.  Comparison on frequencies of pericardial effusion and tamponade following open heart surgery in patients with or without low negative pressure suction on chest tube.

Authors:  Farinaz Khodadadi; Sasan Gilani; Pouria Shoureshi
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 2.  Chronic massive pericardial effusion: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Ying-Shuo Huang; Jian-Xiong Zhang; Ying Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  The Value of Cytology in the Evaluation of Malignant Pericardial Effusions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranim Shartouni; Roy Shartouni; Maryam Mahmoodi; Ilias P Nikas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 4.  New Approaches to Management of Pericardial Effusions.

Authors:  George Lazaros; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Emilia Lazarou; Konstantinos Tsioufis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea Pennacchioni; Giulia Nanni; Fabio Alfredo Sgura; Jacopo Francesco Imberti; Daniel Enrique Monopoli; Rosario Rossi; Giuseppe Longo; Salvatore Arrotti; Marco Vitolo; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.397

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.