Literature DB >> 30480428

Striatal, Hippocampal, and Cortical Networks Are Differentially Responsive to the M4- and M1-Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Mediated Effects of Xanomeline.

Catherine A Thorn, Joshua Moon, Clinton A Bourbonais, John Harms, Jeremy R Edgerton, Eda Stark, Stefanus J Steyn, Christopher R Butter, John T Lazzaro1, Rebecca E O'Connor1, Michael Popiolek.   

Abstract

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation may be therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of schizophrenia and Alzheimer's diseases. This is best exemplified by clinical observations with xanomeline, the efficacy of which is thought to be mediated through co-activation of the M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Here we examined the impact of treatment with xanomeline and compared it to the actions of selective M1 and M4 mAChR activators on in vivo intracellular signaling cascades in mice, including 3'-5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation and inositol phosphate-1 (IP1) accumulation in the striatum, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. We additionally assessed the effects of xanomeline on hippocampal electrophysiological signatures in rats using ex vivo recordings from CA1 (Cornu Ammonis 1) as well as in vivo hippocampal theta. As expected, xanomeline's effects across these readouts were consistent with activation of both M1 and M4 mAChRs; however, differences were observed across different brain regions, suggesting non-uniform activation of these receptor subtypes in the central nervous system. Interestingly, despite having nearly equal in vitro potency at the M1 and the M4 mAChRs, during in vivo assays xanomeline produced M4-like effects at significantly lower brain exposures than those at which M1-like effects were observed. Our results raise the possibility that clinical efficacy observed with xanomeline was driven, in part, through its non-uniform activation of mAChR subtypes in the central nervous system and, at lower doses, through preferential agonism of the M4 mAChR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Xanomeline; biochemistry; electrophysiology; hippocampus; in vivo potency; muscarinic acetylcholine receptor; striatum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30480428     DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci        ISSN: 1948-7193            Impact factor:   4.418


  4 in total

1.  Discovery of Selective M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists with Novel Carbamate Isosteres.

Authors:  Qingyi Yang; Erik A Lachapelle; Natasha M Kablaoui; Damien Webb; Michael Popiolek; Sarah Grimwood; Rouba Kozak; Rebecca E O'Connor; John T Lazzaro; Christopher R Butler; Lei Zhang
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 2.  Targeting muscarinic receptors to treat schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Foster; Zoey K Bryant; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The M1/M4 preferring muscarinic agonist xanomeline modulates functional connectivity and NMDAR antagonist-induced changes in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Caterina Montani; Carola Canella; Adam J Schwarz; Jennifer Li; Gary Gilmour; Alberto Galbusera; Keith Wafford; Daniel Gutierrez-Barragan; Andrew McCarthy; David Shaw; Karen Knitowski; David McKinzie; Alessandro Gozzi; Christian Felder
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Beyond antipsychotics: a twenty-first century update for preclinical development of schizophrenia therapeutics.

Authors:  Daisy L Spark; Alex Fornito; Christopher J Langmead; Gregory D Stewart
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.