Daniel Okeowo1, Alastair Patterson1, Cynthia Boyd2, Emily Reeve3, Danijela Gnjidic4, Adam Todd5. 1. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. NHMRC-Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Geriatric Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, NS, Canada. 4. Faculty of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 5. Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Rm G.66, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was (1) to apply the current United Kingdom (UK) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guidelines to a hypothetical older patient with multimorbidity and life-limiting illness; (2) consider how treatment choices could be influenced by NICE guidance specifically related to multimorbidity; and, (3) ascertain if such clinical practice guidelines describe how and when medication should be reviewed, reduced and stopped. METHODS: Based upon common long-term conditions in older people, a hypothetical older patient was constructed. Relevant NICE guidelines were applied to the hypothetical patient to determine what medication should be initiated in three treatment models: a new patient model, a treatment-resistant model, and a last-line model. Medication complexity for each model was assessed according to the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI). RESULTS: The majority of the guidelines recommended the initiation of medication in the hypothetical patient; if the initial treatment approach was unsuccessful, each guideline advocated the use of more medication, with the regimen becoming increasingly complex. In the new patient model, 4 separate medications (9 dosage units) would be initiated per day; for the treatment-resistant model, 6 separate medications (15 dosage units); and, for the last-line model, 11 separate medications (20 dosage units). None of the guidelines used for the hypothetical patient discussed approaches to stopping medication. CONCLUSIONS: In a UK context, disease-specific clinical practice guidelines routinely advocate the initiation of medication to manage long-term conditions, with medication regimens becoming increasingly complex through the different steps of care. There is often a lack of information regarding specific treatment recommendations for older people with life-limiting illness and multimorbidity. While guidelines frequently explain how and when a medication should be initiated, there is often no information concerning when and how the medications should be reduced or stopped.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was (1) to apply the current United Kingdom (UK) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guidelines to a hypothetical older patient with multimorbidity and life-limiting illness; (2) consider how treatment choices could be influenced by NICE guidance specifically related to multimorbidity; and, (3) ascertain if such clinical practice guidelines describe how and when medication should be reviewed, reduced and stopped. METHODS: Based upon common long-term conditions in older people, a hypothetical older patient was constructed. Relevant NICE guidelines were applied to the hypothetical patient to determine what medication should be initiated in three treatment models: a new patient model, a treatment-resistant model, and a last-line model. Medication complexity for each model was assessed according to the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI). RESULTS: The majority of the guidelines recommended the initiation of medication in the hypothetical patient; if the initial treatment approach was unsuccessful, each guideline advocated the use of more medication, with the regimen becoming increasingly complex. In the new patient model, 4 separate medications (9 dosage units) would be initiated per day; for the treatment-resistant model, 6 separate medications (15 dosage units); and, for the last-line model, 11 separate medications (20 dosage units). None of the guidelines used for the hypothetical patient discussed approaches to stopping medication. CONCLUSIONS: In a UK context, disease-specific clinical practice guidelines routinely advocate the initiation of medication to manage long-term conditions, with medication regimens becoming increasingly complex through the different steps of care. There is often a lack of information regarding specific treatment recommendations for older people with life-limiting illness and multimorbidity. While guidelines frequently explain how and when a medication should be initiated, there is often no information concerning when and how the medications should be reduced or stopped.
Entities:
Keywords:
clinical practice guidelines; deprescribing; medication utilization; older people
Authors: Carlos O Weiss; Ravi Varadhan; Milo A Puhan; Andrew Vickers; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Cynthia M Boyd; David M Kent Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: M R Chassin; R H Brook; R E Park; J Keesey; A Fink; J Kosecoff; K Kahn; N Merrick; D H Solomon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-01-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adam A Markovitz; Timothy P Hofer; Whit Froehlich; Shannon E Lohman; Tanner J Caverly; Jeremy B Sussman; Eve A Kerr Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Marjolein Lugtenberg; Jako S Burgers; Carolyn Clancy; Gert P Westert; Eric C Schneider Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carol Jagger; Fiona E Matthews; Pia Wohland; Tony Fouweather; Blossom C M Stephan; Louise Robinson; Antony Arthur; Carol Brayne Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: José Alberto Domínguez-Alonso; David Conde-Estévez; David Bosch; Maria Pi-Figueras; Ignacio Tusquets Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Ana Basto-Abreu; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez; Alisha N Wade; Daniela Oliveira de Melo; Ana S Semeão de Souza; Bruno P Nunes; Arokiasamy Perianayagam; Maoyi Tian; Lijing L Yan; Arpita Ghosh; J Jaime Miranda Journal: J Multimorb Comorb Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Chanchanok Aramrat; Yanee Choksomngam; Wichuda Jiraporncharoen; Nutchar Wiwatkunupakarn; Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish; Poppy Alice Carson Mallinson; Sanjay Kinra; Chaisiri Angkurawaranon Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 1.792
Authors: Sion Scott; Michael J Twigg; Allan Clark; Carol Farrow; Helen May; Martyn Patel; Johanna Taylor; David J Wright; Debi Bhattacharya Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 10.668