| Literature DB >> 30479556 |
Eliakimu Paul1, Ireen Kiwelu2,3, Blandina Mmbaga2,3, Rebeka Nazareth1, Elias Sabuni1, Athanasia Maro2, Arnold Ndaro2,3, Jo E B Halliday4, Jaffu Chilongola1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy represents a risk for congenital disease, especially among women without previous exposure to infection. There is, however, a paucity of information about the epidemiology of T. gondii infection in pregnant women in Tanzania. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection and associated demographic, clinical, and behavioral risk factors in pregnant women attending ante-natal clinic (ANC) at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center (KCMC), a referral medical center in Northern Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Molecular diagnostics; PCR; Pregnant women; Serology; Tanzania; Toxoplasma gondii; Toxoplasmosis; Zoonoses
Year: 2018 PMID: 30479556 PMCID: PMC6245905 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-018-0122-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Logistic regression analyses of participant factors associated with T. gondii seropositivity
| Variable | Category | Positive: | Bivariable | Multivariable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cOR | 95% CI | aOR | 95%CI | |||||
| Age groups | < 25 | 20/43 (46.5) | 1 | |||||
| 25–35 | 72/171 (42.1) | 0.836 | 0.427–1.637 | 0.602 | ||||
| > 35 | 21/40 (52.5) | 1.271 | 0.536–3.012 | 0.586 | ||||
| Residence | Rural | 42/96 (43.8) | 1 | |||||
| Urban | 71/158 (44.9) | 1.049 | 0.630–1.749 | 0.854 | ||||
| Education level | Primary Education | 33/64 (51.6) | 1.431 | 0.806–2.541 | 0.221 | 1.478 | 0.727–3.005 | 0.281 |
| ≥ Secondary education | 80/190 (42.1) | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Occupation | Student | 5/17 (29.4) | 1 | 1 | ||||
| House wife | 7/19 (36.8) | 1.400 | 0.346–5.672 | 0.637 | 0.991 | 0.215–4.571 | 0.991 | |
| Famers | 8/15 (53.3) | 2.743 | 0.640–11.753 | 0.174 | 1.917 | 0.390–9.425 | 0.423 | |
| Employed | 43/91 (47.3) | 2.150 | 0.700–6.599 | 0.181 | 1.511 | 0.441–5.174 | 0.511 | |
| Business | 50/112 (44.6) | 1.935 | 0.639–5.860 | 0.243 | 1.742 | 0.542–5.595 | 0.351 | |
| HIV status | Negative | 100/229 (43.7) | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Positive | 7/13 (53.8) | 0.676 | 0.220–2.075 | 0.494 | 0.699 | 0.220–2.223 | 0.544 | |
| Cat ownership | Yes | 20/39 (51.3) | 1.355 | 0.684–2.683 | 0.384 | |||
| No | 93/254 (43.3) | 1 | ||||||
| Eating undercooked meat | Yes | 89/201 (44.3) | 0.98 | 0.533–1.800 | 0.947 | |||
| No | 24/53 (45.3) | 1 | ||||||
| Eating raw vegetables | Yes | 92/221 (41.6) | 0.415 | 0.195–0.886 | 0.023 | 0.344 | 0.151–0.784 | 0.011** |
| No | 21/33 (63.6) | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Eating unwashed fruits | Yes | 20/44 (45.5) | 1.028 | 0.535–1.975 | 0.933 | |||
| No | 93/210 (44.3) | 1 | ||||||
| Water sources | Tap water | 104/237 (43.8) | 0.803 | 0.292–2.211 | 0.671 | |||
| Others | 9/17 (52.9) | 1 | ||||||
| Regular soil contact | Yes | 74/181 (40.9) | 0.617 | 0.357–1.066 | 0.083 | 0.482 | 0.268–0.868 | 0.015** |
| No | 39/73 (53.4) | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Habit of eating soil (geophage) | Yes | 20/49 (40.8) | 0.788 | 0.433–1.434 | 0.435 | |||
| No | 93/205 (45.4) | 1 | ||||||
cOR crude odds ratio, aOR adjusted odds ratio
Participant characteristics (n = 254)
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age group (years) | ||
| < 25 | 43 | 16.9 |
| 25–35 | 171 | 67.3 |
| > 35 | 40 | 15.7 |
| District of residence | ||
| Moshi Rural District | 96 | 37.8 |
| Moshi Urban District | 158 | 62.2 |
| Education level | ||
| Primary education | 64 | 25.2 |
| Secondary education | 77 | 30.3 |
| College/pre university education | 45 | 17.7 |
| University education | 68 | 26.8 |
| Occupation | ||
| Student | 17 | 6.7 |
| House wife | 19 | 7.5 |
| Farmer | 15 | 5.9 |
| Employed | 91 | 35.8 |
| Self-employed business women | 112 | 44.1 |
| Gravidity index | ||
| Primigravida | 80 | 31.5 |
| Multigravida | 174 | 68.5 |
| Trimester | ||
| 1st trimester | 10 | 3.9 |
| 2nd trimester | 66 | 26.0 |
| 3rd trimester | 178 | 70.1 |
| HIV status | ||
| Positive | 13 | 5.1 |
| Negative | 229 | 90.2 |
| Not known | 12 | 4.7 |
| Heard about toxoplasmosis | ||
| Yes | 27 | 10.6 |
| No | 227 | 89.4 |
| Knowledge on toxoplasmosis routes of infection | ||
| Yes | 22 | 8.7 |
| No | 232 | 91.3 |
| Knowledge on effect of toxoplasmosis during pregnancy | ||
| Yes | 14 | 5.5 |
| No | 240 | 94.5 |
Seropositivity of T. gondii-specific IgG and IgM antibodies
| IgG positivity | IgM positivity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgM +ve* | IgM –ve | IgM borderline | Totals | |
| IgG +ve* | 12 (4.7) | 77 (30.3) | 13 (5.1) | 102 (40.2%) |
| IgG –ve | 10 (3.9) | 131 (51.6) ** | 3 (1.2) *** | 144 (56.7%) |
| IgG borderline | 1 (0.4) | 7 (2.8) *** | 8 (3.1%) | |
| Totals | 23 (9.1%) | 215 (84.6%) | 16 (6.3%) | 254 |
Numbers indicate counts with respective percentages in parentheses. *All samples in the row and column are positive (n = 113). **Negative (n = 131). ***Equivocal (n = 10)