OBJECTIVE: CDKL5 is a genetic condition associated with drug-resistant epilepsy and intellectual disability. There is limited information on its natural history. We investigated the natural history, complications, and the effectiveness of current treatment strategies. METHODS: This study was conducted in conjunction with the CDKL5-UK Charity, with patients recruited from the USA and Europe. Online questionnaires were completed by parents/carers and included information relating to demographics, growth, development, epilepsy, comorbid conditions, and efficacy and side effects of antiepileptic treatments. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of the 44 patients were female. Median age was five years (range five months to 31 years), and all had a history of epilepsy. All patients had developmental delay, with 4/21 able to run and 4/22 able to climb. Gastrointestinal problems were reported in 31/43. Cardiac arrhythmia was seen in 11/29. Over one-quarter of the patients had tried ten or more antiepileptic medications. Vigabatrin was reportedly the most effective AED (antiepileptic drug) in 12/23; clobazam (most effective in 6/14); sodium valproate (most effective in 5/27), and levetiracetam (most effective in 3/27). VNS (Vagal Nerve Stimulator) was reported to be effective in 9/12. One year after VNS insertion, 9/12 reported improved (QoL), and there were improvements in mood, school achievement and concentration in (9/11). The ketogenic diet was considered effective and to have improved QoL in (12/23). CONCLUSION: Vigabatrin appears to be more effective than other AEDs. VNS and ketogenic diet are also relatively effective. Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular system complications are common. The results may help to guide management of epilepsy in CDKL5. It highlights a possible link between CDKL5 and potentially treatable life-threatening complications such as cardiac arrhythmia. More research in this area may help us develop a more systematic approach to treating these patients. HIPPOKRATIA 2017, 21(3): 130-135.
OBJECTIVE:CDKL5 is a genetic condition associated with drug-resistant epilepsy and intellectual disability. There is limited information on its natural history. We investigated the natural history, complications, and the effectiveness of current treatment strategies. METHODS: This study was conducted in conjunction with the CDKL5-UK Charity, with patients recruited from the USA and Europe. Online questionnaires were completed by parents/carers and included information relating to demographics, growth, development, epilepsy, comorbid conditions, and efficacy and side effects of antiepileptic treatments. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of the 44 patients were female. Median age was five years (range five months to 31 years), and all had a history of epilepsy. All patients had developmental delay, with 4/21 able to run and 4/22 able to climb. Gastrointestinal problems were reported in 31/43. Cardiac arrhythmia was seen in 11/29. Over one-quarter of the patients had tried ten or more antiepileptic medications. Vigabatrin was reportedly the most effective AED (antiepileptic drug) in 12/23; clobazam (most effective in 6/14); sodium valproate (most effective in 5/27), and levetiracetam (most effective in 3/27). VNS (Vagal Nerve Stimulator) was reported to be effective in 9/12. One year after VNS insertion, 9/12 reported improved (QoL), and there were improvements in mood, school achievement and concentration in (9/11). The ketogenic diet was considered effective and to have improved QoL in (12/23). CONCLUSION:Vigabatrin appears to be more effective than other AEDs. VNS and ketogenic diet are also relatively effective. Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular system complications are common. The results may help to guide management of epilepsy in CDKL5. It highlights a possible link between CDKL5 and potentially treatable life-threatening complications such as cardiac arrhythmia. More research in this area may help us develop a more systematic approach to treating these patients. HIPPOKRATIA 2017, 21(3): 130-135.
Authors: E Del Giudice; A Staiano; G Capano; A Romano; L Florimonte; E Miele; C Ciarla; A Campanozzi; A F Crisanti Journal: Brain Dev Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Linda S Weaving; John Christodoulou; Sarah L Williamson; Kathie L Friend; Olivia L D McKenzie; Hayley Archer; Julie Evans; Angus Clarke; Gregory J Pelka; Patrick P L Tam; Catherine Watson; Hooshang Lahooti; Carolyn J Ellaway; Bruce Bennetts; Helen Leonard; Jozef Gécz Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Ralph D Hector; Owen Dando; Nicoletta Landsberger; Charlotte Kilstrup-Nielsen; Peter C Kind; Mark E S Bailey; Stuart R Cobb Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Heather E Olson; Scott T Demarest; Elia M Pestana-Knight; Lindsay C Swanson; Sumaiya Iqbal; Dennis Lal; Helen Leonard; J Helen Cross; Orrin Devinsky; Tim A Benke Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2019-02-23 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: William Hong; Isabel Haviland; Elia Pestana-Knight; Judith L Weisenberg; Scott Demarest; Eric D Marsh; Heather E Olson Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2022-05-28 Impact factor: 6.497
Authors: Sam Amin; Marie Monaghan; Angel Aledo-Serrano; Nadia Bahi-Buisson; Richard F Chin; Angus J Clarke; J Helen Cross; Scott Demarest; Orrin Devinsky; Jenny Downs; Elia M Pestana Knight; Heather Olson; Carol-Anne Partridge; Graham Stuart; Marina Trivisano; Sameer Zuberi; Tim A Benke Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Carlo Efisio Marras; Gabriella Colicchio; Luca De Palma; Alessandro De Benedictis; Giancarlo Di Gennaro; Marilou Cavaliere; Elisabetta Cesaroni; Alessandro Consales; Sofia Asioli; Massimo Caulo; Flavio Villani; Nelia Zamponi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 3.390