Britny Martens1, Logan Veldman1, Merrill Singleton1, Susan Fawcett1, Samina Ali2. 1. Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Women & Children's Research Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: sali@ualberta.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe radiation therapists' (RTs) perceptions of advanced practice (AP) and determine perceived barriers and benefits to the role. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional electronic survey of Albertan RTs was conducted from October to November 2016. The Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists database was used to identify participants, and a modified Dillman methodology was used for survey distribution. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 29.3% (56/191). Most respondents had a Bachelor's degree (58.9%, 33/56) and 10 or more years of experience (60.7%, 34/56). Respondents included individuals in management/education positions (22.6%, 12/53) and clinical practitioners (58.5%, 31/53). Respondents reported high agreement with a number of definition components of AP, including a requirement for at least 5-year experience (90.5% ± 17.6%). Respondents viewed increased knowledge in specialty areas (97.7%, 43/44), job satisfaction (88.6%, 39/44), enhanced patient care due to collaborative practice (88.6%, 39/44), and increased continuity of care (86.4%, 38/44) as benefits. Respondents highly agreed that AP would benefit patients in Alberta (83.2% ± 23.7%); there was less personal interest in becoming advanced practitioners (58.3% ±35.7%). Insufficient directives, guidance, and training were seen as personal (93.6%, 45/47) and professional (91.3%, 42/46) barriers to AP. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Albertan RTs agree with the components of AP proposed by the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists as well as the benefits of creating the position. There is an urgent need to provide clear guidance and directives to RTs with regard to AP practice parameters and training requirements in order for successful implementation.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe radiation therapists' (RTs) perceptions of advanced practice (AP) and determine perceived barriers and benefits to the role. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional electronic survey of Albertan RTs was conducted from October to November 2016. The Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists database was used to identify participants, and a modified Dillman methodology was used for survey distribution. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 29.3% (56/191). Most respondents had a Bachelor's degree (58.9%, 33/56) and 10 or more years of experience (60.7%, 34/56). Respondents included individuals in management/education positions (22.6%, 12/53) and clinical practitioners (58.5%, 31/53). Respondents reported high agreement with a number of definition components of AP, including a requirement for at least 5-year experience (90.5% ± 17.6%). Respondents viewed increased knowledge in specialty areas (97.7%, 43/44), job satisfaction (88.6%, 39/44), enhanced patient care due to collaborative practice (88.6%, 39/44), and increased continuity of care (86.4%, 38/44) as benefits. Respondents highly agreed that AP would benefit patients in Alberta (83.2% ± 23.7%); there was less personal interest in becoming advanced practitioners (58.3% ±35.7%). Insufficient directives, guidance, and training were seen as personal (93.6%, 45/47) and professional (91.3%, 42/46) barriers to AP. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Albertan RTs agree with the components of AP proposed by the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists as well as the benefits of creating the position. There is an urgent need to provide clear guidance and directives to RTs with regard to AP practice parameters and training requirements in order for successful implementation.