| Literature DB >> 30478901 |
Mohammad Khabbaz Shirazi1, Asaad Azarnezhad2, Mohammad Foad Abazari3, Mansour Poorebrahim4, Pegah Ghoraeian3, Nima Sanadgol5, Hanieh Bokharaie6, Sahar Heydari7, Amin Abbasi8, Sahra Kabiri9, Maryam Nouri Aleagha3, Seyed Ehsan Enderami10, Amir Savar Dashtaki11, Hassan Askari12.
Abstract
The interplay between H2 S and nitric oxide (NO) is thought to contribute to renal functions. The current study was designed to assess the role of NO in mediating the renoprotective effects of hydrogen sulfide in the 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6 Nx) animal model. Forty rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups: (a) Sham; (b) 5/6 Nx; (c) 5/6Nx+sodium hydrosulfide-a donor of H 2 S, (5/6Nx+sodium hydrosulfide [NaHS]); (d) 5/6Nx+NaHS+ L-NAME (a nonspecific nitric oxide synthase [NOS] inhibitor); (e) 5/6Nx+NaHS+aminoguanidine (a selective inhibitor of inducible NOS [iNOS]). Twelve weeks after 5/6 Nx, we assessed the expressions of iNOS and endothelial NOS (eNOS), oxidative/antioxidant status, renal fibrosis, urine N-acetyl-b-glucosaminidase (NAG) activity as the markers of kidney injury and various markers of apoptosis, inflammation, remodeling, and autophagy. NaHS treatment protected the animals against chronic kidney injury as depicted by improved oxidative/antioxidant status, reduced apoptosis, and autophagy and attenuated messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of genes associated with inflammation, remodeling, and NAG activity. Eight weeks Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester ( L-NAME) administration reduced the protective effects of hydrogen sulfide. In contrast, aminoguanidine augmented the beneficial effects of hydrogen sulfide. Our finding revealed some fascinating interactions between NO and H 2 S in the kidney. Moreover, the study suggests that NO, in an isoform-dependent manner, can exert renoprotective effects in 5/6 Nx model of CKD.Entities:
Keywords: autophagy; chronic kidney disease (CKD); hydrogen sulfide; nitric oxide (NO); oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30478901 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Physiol ISSN: 0021-9541 Impact factor: 6.384