Irma Corral1, Hope Landrine2. 1. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Medicine, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd., Mailstop 694, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. 2. Departments of Psychology and Public Health, Center for Health Disparities, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 1800 W 5th Street, Suite 6, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. landrineh@ecu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although African-Americans have a higher prevalence of severe obesity than Whites, they are less likely to have bariatric surgery. Demographic, healthcare, and knowledge variables contribute to this racial disparity but have not been examined separately by race. OBJECTIVES: Examine the role of demographic, healthcare, and knowledge variables in African-Americans' versus Whites' interest in bariatric surgery. METHODS: A random sample of 293 African-American and 259 White adults were surveyed door-to-door in the rural south. The survey assessed weight, height, demographics, access to healthcare, and knowledge of and interest in bariatric surgery. RESULTS: African-Americans had significantly lower knowledge of bariatric surgery than Whites but there were no racial differences in interest in the surgery. The logistic regression predicting African-Americans' interest in the surgery from demographic, healthcare, obesity, and knowledge variables revealed that obesity (OR = 4.7) and the health benefits (OR = 3.3) were the only predictors. The same regression for Whites found that knowing someone who had the surgery (OR = 3.7) was the sole predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge variables may be stronger than healthcare and demographic variables as predictors of interest in bariatric surgery among rural, southern, African-Americans and Whites. Whites' willingness to consider the surgery might be enhanced by favorable stories/blogs by those who had the surgery, whereas African-Americans' interest might be increased by information on the additional health benefits of the surgery. These culturally tailored messages from healthcare providers might increase utilization of and reduce racial disparities in bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: Although African-Americans have a higher prevalence of severe obesity than Whites, they are less likely to have bariatric surgery. Demographic, healthcare, and knowledge variables contribute to this racial disparity but have not been examined separately by race. OBJECTIVES: Examine the role of demographic, healthcare, and knowledge variables in African-Americans' versus Whites' interest in bariatric surgery. METHODS: A random sample of 293 African-American and 259 White adults were surveyed door-to-door in the rural south. The survey assessed weight, height, demographics, access to healthcare, and knowledge of and interest in bariatric surgery. RESULTS: African-Americans had significantly lower knowledge of bariatric surgery than Whites but there were no racial differences in interest in the surgery. The logistic regression predicting African-Americans' interest in the surgery from demographic, healthcare, obesity, and knowledge variables revealed that obesity (OR = 4.7) and the health benefits (OR = 3.3) were the only predictors. The same regression for Whites found that knowing someone who had the surgery (OR = 3.7) was the sole predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge variables may be stronger than healthcare and demographic variables as predictors of interest in bariatric surgery among rural, southern, African-Americans and Whites. Whites' willingness to consider the surgery might be enhanced by favorable stories/blogs by those who had the surgery, whereas African-Americans' interest might be increased by information on the additional health benefits of the surgery. These culturally tailored messages from healthcare providers might increase utilization of and reduce racial disparities in bariatric surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Disparities; Race and ethnicity
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Markku Peltonen; Peter Jacobson; C David Sjöström; Kristjan Karason; Hans Wedel; Sofie Ahlin; Åsa Anveden; Calle Bengtsson; Gerd Bergmark; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Jan Karlsson; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Hans Lönroth; Kristina Narbro; Ingmar Näslund; Torsten Olbers; Per-Arne Svensson; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ted D Adams; Richard E Gress; Sherman C Smith; R Chad Halverson; Steven C Simper; Wayne D Rosamond; Michael J Lamonte; Antoinette M Stroup; Steven C Hunt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lisa B Signorello; David G Schlundt; Sarah S Cohen; Mark D Steinwandel; Maciej S Buchowski; Joseph K McLaughlin; Margaret K Hargreaves; William J Blot Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anders Gummesson; C David Sjöström; Kristina Narbro; Markku Peltonen; Hans Wedel; Calle Bengtsson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Peter Jacobson; Kristjan Karason; Jan Karlsson; Bo Larsson; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Hans Lönroth; Ingmar Näslund; Torsten Olbers; Kaj Stenlöf; Jarl Torgerson; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 41.316