Florence Duffaud1, Olivier Mir2, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette3, Sophie Piperno-Neumann4, Nicolas Penel5, Emanuelle Bompas6, Corinne Delcambre7, Elsa Kalbacher8, Antoine Italiano9, Olivier Collard10, Christine Chevreau11, Esma Saada12, Nicolas Isambert13, Jessy Delaye14, Camille Schiffler15, Corinne Bouvier16, Vincent Vidal17, Sylvie Chabaud15, Jean-Yves Blay18. 1. Medical Oncology Unit, Aix Marseille University, APHM Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France. Electronic address: florence.duffaud@ap-hm.fr. 2. Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. 3. Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, Paris, France. 4. Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France. 5. Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret and Lille University Hospital, Lille, France. 6. Medical Oncology Department, Centre René Gauduchau, Saint Herblain, France. 7. Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France. 8. Medical Oncology Department, CHRU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France. 9. Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. 10. Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez, France. 11. Medical Oncology Department, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France. 12. Medical Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France. 13. Medical Oncology Department, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France. 14. UNICANCER, Paris, France. 15. Department of Statistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 16. Pathology Department, Aix Marseille University, APHM Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France. 17. Radiology Department, Aix Marseille University, APHM Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France. 18. Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Regorafenib has proven activity in patients with pretreated gastrointestinal stromal tumours and colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma. We designed REGOBONE to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with progressive metastatic osteosarcoma and other bone sarcomas. This trial comprised four parallel independent cohorts: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordoma. In this Article, we report the results of the osteosarcoma cohort. METHODS: In this non-comparative, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, patients aged 10 years or older with histologically confirmed osteosarcoma whose disease had progressed after treatment with one to two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral regorafenib (160 mg/day, for 21 of 28 days) or matching placebo. Patients in both groups also received best supportive care. Randomisation was done using a web-based system and was stratified (permuted block) by age at inclusion (<18 vs ≥18 years old). Investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the placebo group, after centrally confirmed progressive disease, could cross over to receive regorafenib. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without disease progression at 8 weeks. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat (ie, patients without any major entry criteria violation who initiated masked study drug treatment were included). All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02389244, and the results presented here are the final analysis of the osteosarcoma cohort (others cohorts are ongoing). FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2014, and April 4, 2017, 43 adult patients were enrolled from 13 French comprehensive cancer centres. All patients received at least one dose of assigned treatment and were evaluable for safety; five patients were excluded for major protocol violations (two in the placebogroup and three in the regorafenib group), leaving 38 patients who were evaluable for efficacy (12 in the placebo group and 26 in the regorafenib group). 17 of 26 patients (65%; one-sided 95% CI 47%) in the regorafenib group were non-progressive at 8 weeks compared with no patients in the placebo group. Ten patients in the placebo group crossed over to receive open-label regorafenib after centrally confirmed disease progression. 13 treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in seven (24%) of 29 patients in the regorafenib group versus none of 14 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events during the double-blind period of treatment included hypertension (in seven [24%] of 29 patients in the regorafenib group vs none in the placebo group), hand-foot skin reaction (three [10%] vs none), fatigue (three [10%] vs one [3%]), hypophosphataemia (three [10%] vs none), and chest pain (three [10%] vs none). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION:Regorafenib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumour activity in adult patients with recurrent, progressive, metastatic osteosarcoma after failure ofconventional chemotherapy, with a positive effect on delaying disease progression. Regorafenib should be further evaluated in the setting of advanced disease as well as potentially earlier in the disease course for patients at high risk of relapse. Regorafenib might have an important therapeutic role as an agent complementary to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium against osteosarcoma. FUNDING: Bayer HealthCare.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Regorafenib has proven activity in patients with pretreated gastrointestinal stromal tumours and colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma. We designed REGOBONE to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with progressive metastatic osteosarcoma and other bone sarcomas. This trial comprised four parallel independent cohorts: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordoma. In this Article, we report the results of the osteosarcoma cohort. METHODS: In this non-comparative, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, patients aged 10 years or older with histologically confirmed osteosarcoma whose disease had progressed after treatment with one to two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral regorafenib (160 mg/day, for 21 of 28 days) or matching placebo. Patients in both groups also received best supportive care. Randomisation was done using a web-based system and was stratified (permuted block) by age at inclusion (<18 vs ≥18 years old). Investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the placebo group, after centrally confirmed progressive disease, could cross over to receive regorafenib. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without disease progression at 8 weeks. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat (ie, patients without any major entry criteria violation who initiated masked study drug treatment were included). All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02389244, and the results presented here are the final analysis of the osteosarcoma cohort (others cohorts are ongoing). FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2014, and April 4, 2017, 43 adult patients were enrolled from 13 French comprehensive cancer centres. All patients received at least one dose of assigned treatment and were evaluable for safety; five patients were excluded for major protocol violations (two in the placebo group and three in the regorafenib group), leaving 38 patients who were evaluable for efficacy (12 in the placebo group and 26 in the regorafenib group). 17 of 26 patients (65%; one-sided 95% CI 47%) in the regorafenib group were non-progressive at 8 weeks compared with no patients in the placebo group. Ten patients in the placebo group crossed over to receive open-label regorafenib after centrally confirmed disease progression. 13 treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in seven (24%) of 29 patients in the regorafenib group versus none of 14 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events during the double-blind period of treatment included hypertension (in seven [24%] of 29 patients in the regorafenib group vs none in the placebo group), hand-foot skin reaction (three [10%] vs none), fatigue (three [10%] vs one [3%]), hypophosphataemia (three [10%] vs none), and chest pain (three [10%] vs none). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION:Regorafenib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumour activity in adult patients with recurrent, progressive, metastatic osteosarcoma after failure of conventional chemotherapy, with a positive effect on delaying disease progression. Regorafenib should be further evaluated in the setting of advanced disease as well as potentially earlier in the disease course for patients at high risk of relapse. Regorafenib might have an important therapeutic role as an agent complementary to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium against osteosarcoma. FUNDING: Bayer HealthCare.
Authors: Yoshiyuki Suehara; Deepu Alex; Anita Bowman; Sumit Middha; Ahmet Zehir; Debyani Chakravarty; Lu Wang; George Jour; Khedoudja Nafa; Takuo Hayashi; Achim A Jungbluth; Denise Frosina; Emily Slotkin; Neerav Shukla; Paul Meyers; John H Healey; Meera Hameed; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Arie Jan Verschoor; Frank M Speetjens; P D Sander Dijkstra; Marta Fiocco; Michiel A J van de Sande; Judith V M G Bovée; Hans Gelderblom Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Leo Mascarenhas; Yueh-Yun Chi; Pooja Hingorani; James R Anderson; Elizabeth R Lyden; David A Rodeberg; Daniel J Indelicato; Simon C Kao; Roshni Dasgupta; Sheri L Spunt; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 44.544