Jacob J Bundy1, William J Weadock2, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick3, Rajiv N Srinivasa1, Nishant Patel1, Evan Johnson1, Mamdouh Khayat1, Brian Jeffers1, Joseph J Gemmete1, Ravi N Srinivasa4. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI. 2. Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Inova Alexandria Hospital, 4320 Seminary Road, Alexandria, VA. 4. Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095. Electronic address: medravi@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To create a three-dimensional endoscopic model of the biliary tract from magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging and to evaluate its effectiveness as a tool for training in endoscopic biliary interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography study was performed on a patient with biliary obstruction secondary to a distal bile duct cholangiocarcinoma. Using Vitrea, a three-dimensional volume-rendered image was created, and exported as a standard tessellated language file. The standard tessellated language model was then edited with MeshMixer. Three cylindrical entry ports were created. The ports were aligned and overlapped with the dominant ducts in three separate areas of the model and fused to the model. A 0.2 cm shell was created around the model and the model was hollowed. The ends of the ports were cut off, allowing access to the hollowed-out model. The model was printed at 125% scale to allow easy access with a 9.5-French (≤3.23 mm) endoscope. The model was printed using a Stratasys Dimension Elite Plus printer. After printing, the model was post-processed to remove support materials. A 10-question survey was administered to all trainees before and after use of the printed phantom to practice endoscopy skills. RESULTS: 11 trainees participated in the three-dimensional endoscopy simulation with most of the trainees (73%) having no prior formal endoscopy training. Using a 10-point Likert scale, the mean comfort-level of the trainees to use endoscopy alone for cholecystostomy, percutaneous biliary drainage, percutaneous nephrostomy, and percutaneous gastrostomy increased by 38.9%, 32.8%, 32.8%, and 34.3%, respectively, following the training experience. CONCLUSION: The use of a three-dimensionally printed endoscopic model as a simulation tool has the potential to improve trainee comfort using endoscopy during interventional radiology procedures.
PURPOSE: To create a three-dimensional endoscopic model of the biliary tract from magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging and to evaluate its effectiveness as a tool for training in endoscopic biliary interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography study was performed on a patient with biliary obstruction secondary to a distal bile duct cholangiocarcinoma. Using Vitrea, a three-dimensional volume-rendered image was created, and exported as a standard tessellated language file. The standard tessellated language model was then edited with MeshMixer. Three cylindrical entry ports were created. The ports were aligned and overlapped with the dominant ducts in three separate areas of the model and fused to the model. A 0.2 cm shell was created around the model and the model was hollowed. The ends of the ports were cut off, allowing access to the hollowed-out model. The model was printed at 125% scale to allow easy access with a 9.5-French (≤3.23 mm) endoscope. The model was printed using a Stratasys Dimension Elite Plus printer. After printing, the model was post-processed to remove support materials. A 10-question survey was administered to all trainees before and after use of the printed phantom to practice endoscopy skills. RESULTS: 11 trainees participated in the three-dimensional endoscopy simulation with most of the trainees (73%) having no prior formal endoscopy training. Using a 10-point Likert scale, the mean comfort-level of the trainees to use endoscopy alone for cholecystostomy, percutaneous biliary drainage, percutaneous nephrostomy, and percutaneous gastrostomy increased by 38.9%, 32.8%, 32.8%, and 34.3%, respectively, following the training experience. CONCLUSION: The use of a three-dimensionally printed endoscopic model as a simulation tool has the potential to improve trainee comfort using endoscopy during interventional radiology procedures.