Literature DB >> 30477779

In-vitro comparison of different palatal sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion: Effect of bone quality and quantity on primary stability.

Carine Bourassa1, Yara K Hosein2, Steven I Pollmann3, Khadry Galil4, Richard N Bohay5, David W Holdsworth6, Ali Tassi7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This experiment was undertaken to assess the primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews inserted at different sites in human cadaveric palatal bone for temporary skeletal anchorage, and to determine the effect of bone quality and quantity on their primary stability using microcomputed tomography imaging.
METHODS: A total of 10 cadaveric maxillary hard palates were used for insertion of 130 orthodontic miniscrews (VectorTAS; Ormco, Orange, Calif; length, 6 mm; diameter, 1.4 mm). Upon insertion, maximal insertion torque (IT) was recorded. Imaging (microcomputed tomography) was performed before and after insertion for assessment of bone quality and quantity parameters (bone mineral density [BMD], bone thickness [BT], and length of screw engagement [LSE]). Differences in each parameter were assessed at the various insertion sites. Correlations between IT and measurements of BMD, BT, and LSE were evaluated.
RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.001) were found among insertion sites for IT, BT, and LSE, but not for BMD (P = 0.004). Correlations were found between IT and BMD (rs = 0.42; P < 0.001), IT and BT (rs = 0.58; P < 0.001), and IT and LSE (rs = 0.58; P < 0.001). Most perforations of miniscrews into the nasal cavity occurred posterior to the permanent second premolars.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews in the palate is affected by bone quality and quantity, with higher primary stability obtained anterior to the second premolars and parasagittally at the level of the permanent first molars.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30477779     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Drilling Capability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Alessandra Marchi; Matteo Camporesi; Maurizio Festa; Luis Salvatierra; Sara Izadi; Giampietro Farronato
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-21

2.  Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Weiting Chen; Kaili Zhang; Dongxu Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Evaluation of total bone and cortical bone thickness of the palate for temporary anchorage device insertion.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Wei-Cheng Lin; Meng-Yen Chen; Hung-Chih Chang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Evaluation of Optimal Sites for the Insertion of Orthodontic Mini Implants at Mandibular Symphysis Region through Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Shizhen Zhang; Xiaoyu Wei; Lufei Wang; Zhouqiang Wu; Lu Liu; Xinyu Yan; Wenli Lai; Hu Long
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-23

5.  Description of a Digital Work-Flow for CBCT-Guided Construction of Micro-Implant Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expander.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Vincenzo Quinzi; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Stefano Martina; Orazio Bennici; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.

Authors:  Maha S Al Amri; Hanadi M Sabban; Doaa H Alsaggaf; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ghassan A Al-Turki; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.