André Tichelli1, Eric Beohou2, Myriam Labopin2, Gérard Socié3, Alicia Rovó4, Manuela Badoglio2, Anja van Biezen5, Peter Bader6, Rafael F Duarte7, Grzegorz Basak8, Nina Salooja9. 1. Hematology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. 2. EBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France. 3. Department of Hematology-BMT, Hôpital St Louis, Paris, France. 4. Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 5. EBMT Data Office Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 6. Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Frankfurt, Germany. 7. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain. 8. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Central Clinical Hospital, the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 9. Center for Haematology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Importance: Incidence and risk factors of second solid cancers (SSCs) that occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are well documented. However, clinical outcome data of patients who developed an SSC after HSCT are limited. Objective: To assess the outcome of patients with an SSC occurring after HSCT from the time of SSC diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data of 4065 patients from 26 countries registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, which has maintained clinical data since 1977 of patients who received a transplant. Information from all patients who underwent a transplant in Europe and had an SSC diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, was extracted. The cohort included patients with 18 different cancers. Data analysis was conducted from September 3, 2017, to March 17, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Median and 5-year age-standardized overall survival, causes of death, risk factor multivariate analysis using a clustered Cox proportional hazard regression model, and standardized mortality ratio were calculated for each of the 18 types of SSC. Results: In total, 220 617 patients underwent a transplant, of whom only 4065 (1.8%) patients with a second solid cancer after HSCT were included in the study. Among the 4065 patients, 2321 (57.1%) were men and 1744 (42.9%) were women, with a mean (range) age of 59.1 (3.2-82.3) years at diagnosis of second solid cancer. The 5-year age-standardized overall survival was 47% (95% CI, 45%-49%). The 5-year overall survival rate after SSC diagnosis was poor for pancreas, lung, hepatobiliary, esophageal, brain, and gastric cancers, with a median survival between 0.6 and 1 year. The 5-year overall survival was intermediate for endometrial, colorectal, sarcomas, ovarian, bladder, oropharyngeal, and kidney cancers, with a median survival between 2 and 10 years. The 5-year overall survival was more favorable for melanoma, breast, prostate, cervix, and thyroid cancers, with a median survival of 10 or more years. Additional transplant-associated factors for mortality for patients treated with allogeneic HSCT were age at transplant, donor type, conditioning regimen, and graft-vs-host disease. In total, 1777 patients (43.7%) died, of which 1256 (74.8%) were from SSC, 344 (20.5%) from primary disease, and 79 (4.7%) from other causes. Standardized mortality ratio was higher, compared with de novo solid cancers, for melanoma, prostate, breast, kidney, bladder, colorectal, and endometrial cancers but not for the other cancers. Conclusions and Relevance: The outcome of SSC is mainly dependent on the type of second cancer; thus, future studies should investigate the reasons the standardized mortality ratio is higher for some cancers to identify whether patients with these cancers should be treated differently and to help in screening and counseling patients who developed an SSC after HSCT.
Importance: Incidence and risk factors of second solid cancers (SSCs) that occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are well documented. However, clinical outcome data of patients who developed an SSC after HSCT are limited. Objective: To assess the outcome of patients with an SSC occurring after HSCT from the time of SSC diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data of 4065 patients from 26 countries registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, which has maintained clinical data since 1977 of patients who received a transplant. Information from all patients who underwent a transplant in Europe and had an SSC diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, was extracted. The cohort included patients with 18 different cancers. Data analysis was conducted from September 3, 2017, to March 17, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Median and 5-year age-standardized overall survival, causes of death, risk factor multivariate analysis using a clustered Cox proportional hazard regression model, and standardized mortality ratio were calculated for each of the 18 types of SSC. Results: In total, 220 617 patients underwent a transplant, of whom only 4065 (1.8%) patients with a second solid cancer after HSCT were included in the study. Among the 4065 patients, 2321 (57.1%) were men and 1744 (42.9%) were women, with a mean (range) age of 59.1 (3.2-82.3) years at diagnosis of second solid cancer. The 5-year age-standardized overall survival was 47% (95% CI, 45%-49%). The 5-year overall survival rate after SSC diagnosis was poor for pancreas, lung, hepatobiliary, esophageal, brain, and gastric cancers, with a median survival between 0.6 and 1 year. The 5-year overall survival was intermediate for endometrial, colorectal, sarcomas, ovarian, bladder, oropharyngeal, and kidney cancers, with a median survival between 2 and 10 years. The 5-year overall survival was more favorable for melanoma, breast, prostate, cervix, and thyroid cancers, with a median survival of 10 or more years. Additional transplant-associated factors for mortality for patients treated with allogeneic HSCT were age at transplant, donor type, conditioning regimen, and graft-vs-host disease. In total, 1777 patients (43.7%) died, of which 1256 (74.8%) were from SSC, 344 (20.5%) from primary disease, and 79 (4.7%) from other causes. Standardized mortality ratio was higher, compared with de novo solid cancers, for melanoma, prostate, breast, kidney, bladder, colorectal, and endometrial cancers but not for the other cancers. Conclusions and Relevance: The outcome of SSC is mainly dependent on the type of second cancer; thus, future studies should investigate the reasons the standardized mortality ratio is higher for some cancers to identify whether patients with these cancers should be treated differently and to help in screening and counseling patients who developed an SSC after HSCT.
Authors: H J Kolb; G Socié; T Duell; M T Van Lint; A Tichelli; J F Apperley; E Nekolla; P Ljungman; N Jacobsen; M van Weel; R Wick; M Weiss; H G Prentice Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-11-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: K Shimada; T Yokozawa; Y Atsuta; A Kohno; F Maruyama; K Yano; H Taji; K Kitaori; S Goto; H Iida; Y Morishima; Y Kodera; T Naoe; Y Morishita Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: K Scott Baker; Todd E DeFor; Linda J Burns; Norma K C Ramsay; Joseph P Neglia; Leslie L Robison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura J Havrilesky; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Jessie A Ehrisman; Andrew Berchuck; Fidel A Valea; Paula S Lee; Stephanie L Gaillard; Greg P Samsa; David Cella; Kevin P Weinfurt; Amy P Abernethy; Shelby D Reed Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J Douglas Rizzo; Rochelle E Curtis; Gérard Socié; Kathleen A Sobocinski; Ethel Gilbert; Ola Landgren; Lois B Travis; William D Travis; Mary E D Flowers; Debra L Friedman; Mary M Horowitz; John R Wingard; H Joachim Deeg Journal: Blood Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Guang-Shing Cheng; Louise Bondeelle; Ted Gooley; Qianchuan He; Kareem Jamani; Elizabeth F Krakow; Mary E D Flowers; Régis Peffault de Latour; David Michonneau; Gérard Socié; Jason W Chien; Sylvie Chevret; Anne Bergeron Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Rachel Phelan; Annie Im; Rebecca L Hunter; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini; Alicia Rovo; Sherif M Badawy; Linda Burns; Hesham Eissa; Hemant S Murthy; Pinki Prasad; Akshay Sharma; Elizabeth Suelzer; Vaibhav Agrawal; Mahmoud Aljurf; Karen Baker; Grzegorz W Basak; David Buchbinder; Zachariah DeFilipp; Lana Desnica Grkovic; Ajoy Dias; Hermann Einsele; Michael L Eisenberg; Narendranath Epperla; Nosha Farhadfar; Arthur Flatau; Robert Peter Gale; Hildegard Greinix; Betty K Hamilton; Shahrukh Hashmi; Peiman Hematti; Kareem Jamani; Dipnarine Maharaj; John Murray; Seema Naik; Sunita Nathan; Steven Pavletic; Zinaida Peric; Drazen Pulanic; Richard Ross; Andrea Salonia; Isabel Sanchez-Ortega; Bipin N Savani; Tal Schechter; Ami J Shah; Stephanie M Smith; John A Snowden; Amir Steinberg; Douglas Tremblay; Sarah C Vij; Lauren Walker; Daniel Wolff; Jean A Yared; Hélène Schoemans; André Tichelli Journal: Transplant Cell Ther Date: 2021-10-29
Authors: Rachel Phelan; Annie Im; Hélène Schoemans; André Tichelli; Rebecca L Hunter; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini; Alicia Rovo; Sherif M Badawy; Linda Burns; Hesham Eissa; Hemant S Murthy; Pinki Prasad; Akshay Sharma; Elizabeth Suelzer; Vaibhav Agrawal; Mahmoud Aljurf; Karen Baker; Grzegorz W Basak; David Buchbinder; Zachariah DeFilipp; Lana Desnica Grkovic; Ajoy Dias; Hermann Einsele; Michael L Eisenberg; Narendranath Epperla; Nosha Farhadfar; Arthur Flatau; Robert Peter Gale; Hildegard Greinix; Betty K Hamilton; Shahrukh Hashmi; Peiman Hematti; Kareem Jamani; Dipnarine Maharaj; John Murray; Seema Naik; Sunita Nathan; Steven Pavletic; Zinaida Peric; Drazen Pulanic; Richard Ross; Andrea Salonia; Isabel Sanchez-Ortega; Bipin N Savani; Tal Schechter; Ami J Shah; Stephanie M Smith; John A Snowden; Amir Steinberg; Douglas Tremblay; Sarah C Vij; Lauren Walker; Daniel Wolff; Jean A Yared Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 5.174
Authors: Haneen Shalabi; Juliane Gust; Agne Taraseviciute; Pamela L Wolters; Allison B Leahy; Carlos Sandi; Theodore W Laetsch; Lori Wiener; Rebecca A Gardner; Veronique Nussenblatt; Joshua A Hill; Kevin J Curran; Timothy S Olson; Colleen Annesley; Hao-Wei Wang; Javed Khan; Marcelo C Pasquini; Christine N Duncan; Stephan A Grupp; Michael A Pulsipher; Nirali N Shah Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: James W Day; Reem Elfeky; Bethany Nicholson; Rupert Goodman; Rachel Pearce; Thomas A Fox; Austen Worth; Claire Booth; Paul Veys; Ben Carpenter; Rachael Hough; H Bobby Gaspar; Penny Titman; Deborah Ridout; Sarita Workman; Fernando Hernandes; Kit Sandford; Arian Laurence; Mari Campbell; Siobhan O Burns; Emma C Morris Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 8.542
Authors: Muna Qayed; Kwang Woo Ahn; Carrie L Kitko; Mariam H Johnson; Nirali N Shah; Christopher Dvorak; Karin Mellgren; Brian D Friend; Michael R Verneris; Wing Leung; Jacek Toporski; John Levine; Joseph Chewning; Alan Wayne; Urvi Kapoor; Brandon Triplett; Kirk R Schultz; Gregory A Yanik; Mary Eapen Journal: Blood Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 25.476
Authors: Jeffrey M Lipton; Christine L S Molmenti; Pooja Desai; Alexander Lipton; Steven R Ellis; Adrianna Vlachos Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-12-26 Impact factor: 4.096