Literature DB >> 30476453

Utility of Attenuation Coefficient Measurement Using an Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis: Comparison With MRI-Determined Proton Density Fat Fraction.

Toshifumi Tada1, Takashi Kumada1, Hidenori Toyoda1, Natsuko Kobayashi1, Yasuhiro Sone2, Takuma Oguri3, Naohisa Kamiyama3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, a new method was developed to diagnose hepatic steatosis by measuring attenuation coefficients that are based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP). We investigated the diagnostic ability of these coefficients to detect steatosis that was identified using the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on MRI in patients with chronic liver disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 126 patients with chronic liver disease (non-hepatitis B, non-hepatitis C) were analyzed. The diagnostic ability of UGAP-determined attenuation coefficients was evaluated using ROC curve analysis, and the correlation between MRI-determined PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was determined.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.746 (95% CI, 0.657-0.815) (p < 0.001), corresponding to a strong relationship. The diagnostic ability of attenuation coefficients for steatosis grades ≥ 1, ≥ 2, and 3 as determined by PDFF were 0.922 (95% CI, 0.870-0.973), 0.874 (95% CI, 0.814-0.934), and 0.892 (95% CI, 0.835-0.949), respectively. The r between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.559 (95% CI, 0.391-0.705) (p < 0.001) in patients with mild or no steatosis (grade ≤ 1). In addition, the r between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.773 (95% CI, 0.657-0.853) (p < 0.001) in obese patients (body mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters] ≥ 25). The diagnostic ability of attenuation coefficients for patients with steatosis grades ≥ 1, ≥ 2, and 3 as determined by PDFF were 0.884 (95% CI, 0.792-0.976), 0.863 (95% CI, 0.778-0.947), and 0.889 (95% CI, 0.813-0.965), respectively.
CONCLUSION: UGAP-determined attenuation coefficient values had a good diagnostic ability to detect hepatic steatosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attenuation coefficient; hepatic steatosis; proton density fat fraction; ultrasound; ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30476453     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  System-Independent Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Using Spectra Normalization.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Chengwu Huang; Joshua Trzasko; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Correlation between hepatorenal index and attenuation imaging for assessing hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Shrivuthsun Srigandan; Marilyn Zelesco; Steven Abbott; Christopher J Welman
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Reverberation clutter signal suppression in ultrasound attenuation estimation using wavelet-based robust principal component analysis.

Authors:  U-Wai Lok; Ping Gong; Chengwu Huang; Shanshan Tang; Chenyun Zhou; Lulu Yang; Kymberly D Watt; Matthew Callstrom; Joshua D Trzasko; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 4.  Non-invasive methods for imaging hepatic steatosis and their clinical importance in NAFLD.

Authors:  Nobuharu Tamaki; Veeral Ajmera; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 47.564

Review 5.  Attenuation coefficient (ATT) measurement for liver fat quantification in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Nobuharu Tamaki; Masayuki Kurosaki; Yutaka Yasui; Kaoru Tsuchiya; Namiki Izumi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Quantification of Liver Fibrosis, Steatosis, and Viscosity Using Multiparametric Ultrasound in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Liver Disease: A "Real-Life" Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alexandru Popa; Felix Bende; Roxana Șirli; Alina Popescu; Victor Bâldea; Raluca Lupușoru; Radu Cotrău; Renata Fofiu; Camelia Foncea; Ioan Sporea
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 7.  Epidemiology: Pathogenesis, and Diagnostic Strategy of Diabetic Liver Disease in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshio Sumida; Toshihide Shima; Yasuhide Mitsumoto; Takafumi Katayama; Atsushi Umemura; Kanji Yamaguchi; Yoshito Itoh; Masashi Yoneda; Takeshi Okanoue
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Ultrasound-based techniques for the diagnosis of liver steatosis.

Authors:  Giovanna Ferraioli; Livia Beatriz Soares Monteiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Quantitative ultrasound approaches for diagnosis and monitoring hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Amir M Pirmoazen; Aman Khurana; Ahmed El Kaffas; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Hepatic Steatosis Index in the Detection of Fatty Liver in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Receiving Antiviral Therapy.

Authors:  Jin Won Chang; Hye Won Lee; Beom Kyung Kim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwang-Hyub Han; Seung Up Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.