Anna Gkiouleka1, Lydia Avrami2, Anastasia Kostaki3, Tim Huijts1, Terje A Eikemo4, Theoni Stathopoulou2. 1. Department of Sociology, University of York, York, UK. 2. National Centre for Social Research, Athens, Greece. 3. Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics & Business, Athens, Greece. 4. Department of Sociology and Political Science, Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract
Background: With the current study, we aim to explore the extent that migrants report higher rates of depressive symptoms than non-migrant populations in light of gender, childhood experiences, socioeconomic factors and social support across European countries that have been differentially influenced by the economic crisis. Methods: Using data from the seventh round of the European Social Survey and the Greek MIGHEAL survey, we compare the prevalence of depressive symptoms among migrants and non-migrants aged 25-65 years old across 21 countries. Results: Our findings show that migrants report significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms in seven of the examined countries, while in Greece and in the UK, they report significantly lower levels compared with non-migrant populations. The current climate of socioeconomic instability does not seem to necessarily associate with increased rates of depressive symptoms across countries neither it affects migrants and non-migrants in a similar way. Financial strain, childhood experiences of economic hardship and domestic conflict, female gender, as well as experiences of perceived discrimination appear to associate with increased levels of depressive symptoms among both migrant and non-migrant populations, while social trust and living with children have a protective impact. Still, much variation exists in the range of these associations between migrants and non-migrants and across countries. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the impact of migration status on depressive symptoms is subject to additional determinants of mental health as well as to contextual factors.
Background: With the current study, we aim to explore the extent that migrants report higher rates of depressive symptoms than non-migrant populations in light of gender, childhood experiences, socioeconomic factors and social support across European countries that have been differentially influenced by the economic crisis. Methods: Using data from the seventh round of the European Social Survey and the Greek MIGHEAL survey, we compare the prevalence of depressive symptoms among migrants and non-migrants aged 25-65 years old across 21 countries. Results: Our findings show that migrants report significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms in seven of the examined countries, while in Greece and in the UK, they report significantly lower levels compared with non-migrant populations. The current climate of socioeconomic instability does not seem to necessarily associate with increased rates of depressive symptoms across countries neither it affects migrants and non-migrants in a similar way. Financial strain, childhood experiences of economic hardship and domestic conflict, female gender, as well as experiences of perceived discrimination appear to associate with increased levels of depressive symptoms among both migrant and non-migrant populations, while social trust and living with children have a protective impact. Still, much variation exists in the range of these associations between migrants and non-migrants and across countries. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the impact of migration status on depressive symptoms is subject to additional determinants of mental health as well as to contextual factors.
Authors: Terje A Eikemo; Lydia Avrami; Jennifer Cavounidis; Aliki Mouriki; Anna Gkiouleka; Courtney L McNamara; Theoni Stathopoulou Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Elena Ronda-Pérez; José Miguel Martínez; Alison Reid; Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Benoît Mougenot; Elard Amaya; Edward Mezones-Holguin; Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales; Báltica Cabieses Journal: Global Health Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.185
Authors: Nico Vonneilich; Daniel Bremer; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Daniel Lüdecke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 3.390