Seble Girma1,2, James Cheaveau3,4, Abu Naser Mohon4, Dewdunee Marasinghe5, Ruth Legese4, Nirujah Balasingam4, Adugna Abera1, Sindew M Feleke1, Lemu Golassa2, Dylan R Pillai3,4,6,7. 1. Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. 2. Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. 3. Clinical Section of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, Alberta. 4. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Alberta. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. 6. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Alberta, Canada. 7. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the global public-health objectives for malaria evolve from malaria control towards malaria elimination, there is increasing interest in the significance of asymptomatic infections and the optimal diagnostic test to identify them. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study of asymptomatic individuals (N = 562) to determine the epidemiological characteristics associated with asymptomatic malaria. Participants were tested by rapid diagnostic tests (CareStart, Standard Diagnostics [SD] Bioline, and Alere ultrasensitive RDT [uRDT]), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to determine malaria positivity. Hemoglobin values were recorded, and anemia was defined as a binary variable, according to World Health Organization guidelines. RESULTS: Compared to reference qRT-PCR, LAMP had the highest sensitivity (92.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4-96.5), followed by uRDT Alere Malaria (33.9%, 95% CI 25.5-43.1), CareStart Malaria (14.1%, 95% CI 8.4-21.5), microscopy (5.0%, 95% CI 1.8-10.5), and SD Bioline (5.0%, 95% CI 1.8-10.5). For Plasmodium falciparum specimens only, the sensitivity for uRDT Alere Malaria was 50.0% (95% CI 38.8-61.3) and SD Bioline was 7.3% (95% CI 2.7-15.3). Based on multivariate regression analysis with qRT-PCR as the gold standard, for every 3.2% increase in the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria, hemoglobin decreased by 1 gram per deciliter (prevalence ratio 0.968, 95% CI 0.940-0.997; P = .032). Deletions (4.8%) in hrp2 were noted. CONCLUSIONS: While uRDT Alere Malaria has superior sensitivity to rapid diagnostic tests and microscopy in detecting asymptomatic malaria, LAMP is superior still. Ultrasensitive diagnostics provide the accurate prevalence estimates of asymptomatic malaria required for elimination.
BACKGROUND: As the global public-health objectives for malaria evolve from malaria control towards malaria elimination, there is increasing interest in the significance of asymptomatic infections and the optimal diagnostic test to identify them. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study of asymptomatic individuals (N = 562) to determine the epidemiological characteristics associated with asymptomatic malaria. Participants were tested by rapid diagnostic tests (CareStart, Standard Diagnostics [SD] Bioline, and Alere ultrasensitive RDT [uRDT]), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to determine malaria positivity. Hemoglobin values were recorded, and anemia was defined as a binary variable, according to World Health Organization guidelines. RESULTS: Compared to reference qRT-PCR, LAMP had the highest sensitivity (92.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4-96.5), followed by uRDT Alere Malaria (33.9%, 95% CI 25.5-43.1), CareStart Malaria (14.1%, 95% CI 8.4-21.5), microscopy (5.0%, 95% CI 1.8-10.5), and SD Bioline (5.0%, 95% CI 1.8-10.5). For Plasmodium falciparum specimens only, the sensitivity for uRDT Alere Malaria was 50.0% (95% CI 38.8-61.3) and SD Bioline was 7.3% (95% CI 2.7-15.3). Based on multivariate regression analysis with qRT-PCR as the gold standard, for every 3.2% increase in the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria, hemoglobin decreased by 1 gram per deciliter (prevalence ratio 0.968, 95% CI 0.940-0.997; P = .032). Deletions (4.8%) in hrp2 were noted. CONCLUSIONS: While uRDT Alere Malaria has superior sensitivity to rapid diagnostic tests and microscopy in detecting asymptomatic malaria, LAMP is superior still. Ultrasensitive diagnostics provide the accurate prevalence estimates of asymptomatic malaria required for elimination.
Authors: Abalinda M Gorret; Rabbison Muhindo; Emma Baguma; Moses Ntaro; Edgar M Mulogo; Molly Deutsch-Feldman; Jonathan J Juliano; Dan Nyehangane; Ross M Boyce Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Khalid B Beshir; Lynn Grignard; Khalid Hajissa; Abdulrahman Mohammed; Awolkhier M Nurhussein; Deus S Ishengoma; Inke Nadia D Lubis; Chris J Drakeley; Colin J Sutherland Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: A M Vásquez; G Vélez; A Medina; E Serra-Casas; A Campillo; I J Gonzalez; S C Murphy; A M Seilie; X C Ding; A Tobón Castaño Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 3.007