Literature DB >> 30475948

Biological background of the genomic variations of cf-DNA in healthy individuals.

J Liu1, X Chen2, J Wang3, S Zhou4, C L Wang4, M Z Ye5, X Y Wang4, Y Song4, Y Q Wang4, L T Zhang4, R H Wu4, H M Yang3, S D Zhu6, M Z Zhou5, X C Zhang7, H M Zhu8, Z Y Qian9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cf-DNA)-based liquid biopsy is emerging as a revolutionary new method in individualized cancer treatment and prognosis monitoring, although detecting early-stage cancers using cf-DNA remains challenging, partially because of the undefined biological background of cf-DNA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated somatic mutations in the cf-DNA of 259 cancer-free individuals with a median age of 47 years using an endogenous barcoding duplex method with an ultralow base error rate (2 × 10-7) and compared the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of these mutations between the cf-DNA and the corresponding blood cell DNA.
RESULTS: Sixty percent (155/259) of the samples showed at least one nonsynonymous mutation on either of two similar target panels covering 508 and 559 cancer-related genes. For individuals older than 50 years of age, the positive rate increased to 76%. Most cf-DNA mutations were also present at similar VAFs in the paired blood cell DNA. The most frequently mutated genes were driver genes of hematologic malignancies, including DNMT3A, TET2, AXSL1, and JAK2. However, the other 58.4% (192/329) of the mutations were likely 'passenger mutations' of clonal hematopoiesis, including mutations in NOTCH2, FAT3, EXT2, ERBB4, and ARID2, which are driver genes of solid tumors.
CONCLUSION: Hematopoietic clone-derived mutations, including 'driver mutations' and 'passenger mutations', are prevalent in the cf-DNA of both healthy individuals and cancer patients and may be a potential source of false positives in the liquid biopsy. Our results also suggest the ineffectiveness for distinguishing clonal hematopoietic mutations of low VAF (≤0.1%) from tumor-derived mutations using conventional next-generation sequencing of blood cell DNA. However, an error correction model with an ultralow error rate and high coverage depth is required for blood cell DNA sequencing, which is difficult and costly to achieve with current technologies.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological background; cf-DNA; duplex sequencing; early cancer diagnosis; hematopoietic clone; mutation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30475948     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  29 in total

1.  A Viral Exposure Signature Defines Early Onset of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinping Liu; Wei Tang; Anuradha Budhu; Marshonna Forgues; Maria O Hernandez; Julián Candia; Yujin Kim; Elise D Bowman; Stefan Ambs; Yongmei Zhao; Bao Tran; Xiaolin Wu; Christopher Koh; Pallavi Surana; T Jake Liang; Maria Guarnera; Dean Mann; Manoj Rajaure; Tim F Greten; Zhanwei Wang; Herbert Yu; Xin Wei Wang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Clonal hematopoiesis: background player in plasma cell-free DNA variants.

Authors:  Kun Sun
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Utility of tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA in the clinical management of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Danielle Brazel; Priyanka Kumar; Liudmila N Schafer; Benjamin Eidenschink; Shannon Zhang; Maheswari Senthil; Farshid Dayyani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

Review 4.  Prostate cancer research in the 21st century; report from the 2021 Coffey-Holden prostate cancer academy meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Jelani C Zarif; Catherine C Coombs; Robert R Flavell; Joshua W Russo; Samir Zaidi; Di Zhao; Shuang G Zhao; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 5.  Clinical implementation and current advancement of blood liquid biopsy in cancer.

Authors:  Kazunori Watanabe; Yusuke Nakamura; Siew-Kee Low
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 6.  Mutated circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy in lung cancer detection and treatment.

Authors:  Martyna Filipska; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 7.  When Tissue is an Issue the Liquid Biopsy is Nonissue: A Review.

Authors:  July Rodríguez; Jenny Avila; Christian Rolfo; Alejandro Ruíz-Patiño; Alessandro Russo; Luisa Ricaurte; Camila Ordóñez-Reyes; Oscar Arrieta; Zyanya Lucia Zatarain-Barrón; Gonzalo Recondo; Andrés F Cardona
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2021-03-10

8.  Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer reflects response and survival.

Authors:  M J M Magbanua; L B Swigart; H-T Wu; G L Hirst; C Yau; D M Wolf; A Tin; R Salari; S Shchegrova; H Pawar; A L Delson; A DeMichele; M C Liu; A J Chien; D Tripathy; S Asare; C-H J Lin; P Billings; A Aleshin; H Sethi; M Louie; B Zimmermann; L J Esserman; L J van 't Veer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 51.769

9.  Cell-Free DNA Detection of Tumor Mutations in Heterogeneous, Localized Prostate Cancer Via Targeted, Multiregion Sequencing.

Authors:  Emmalyn Chen; Clinton L Cario; Lancelote Leong; Karen Lopez; César P Márquez; Patricia S Li; Erica Oropeza; Imelda Tenggara; Janet Cowan; Jeffry P Simko; Robin Kageyama; Daniel K Wells; June M Chan; Terence Friedlander; Rahul Aggarwal; Pamela L Paris; Felix Feng; Peter R Carroll; John S Witte
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  Liquid biopsy as an option for predictive testing and prognosis in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Alvida Qvick; Bianca Stenmark; Jessica Carlsson; Johan Isaksson; Christina Karlsson; Gisela Helenius
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 6.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.