| Literature DB >> 30475895 |
Rahul Kumar, Kausar M Ansari, Bhushan P Chaudhari, Alok Dhawan, Premendra D Dwivedi, Swantantra K Jain, Mukul Das.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047280.].Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30475895 PMCID: PMC6258368 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1DNA damaging potential of OTA in mouse skin.
Single cell suspension from vehicle or OTA (20, 40 and 80 μg/mouse) treated mouse skin was prepared and DNA damage was assessed by alkaline comet assay. DNA damage is represented in terms of (A) Tail DNA, (B) Tail Length, and (C) Tail Moment, and (D) Skin cells of vehicle treated animal without comet (400X) and OTA (80 μg/mouse) treated animals showing comet formation (400 X). Data in histogram represents mean ± SE of five animals. *p<0.05, significant with respect to control group. (E) Whole cell extract from vehicle or OTA (20, 40 and 80 μg/mouse) treated mouse skin was prepared and levels of γ-H2AX (Ser139) were assessed by western blot analysis. Values above the lanes of blots are mentioned as fold change with respect to control. For confirmation of equal protein loading, the blots were stripped and probed with an antibody specific for β-actin.