Literature DB >> 3047588

Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles.

R A Ims1.   

Abstract

The spatial organization of individuals in populations (their spacing system) can be highly variable even among populations of the same species. As spacing systems have important consequences for ecological processes such as population regulation, competition and mating systems, there have been many attempts to explore factors that may cause this variation. For mammals, it has been argued that the spatial distribution of sexually receptive females is the most important factor determining the spacing system of males, whereas habitat characteristics are most important to females. This has been difficult to test experimentally as it requires manipulations of the spatial distribution of the opposite sex without changing other properties of the environment. Here, I present a novel experimental procedure that can achieve this and demonstrate that the spatial distribution of the opposite sex in a population of voles is indeed an important determinant of the spacing system of males, but not of females. However, the effects on males are different from those predicted by many theoretical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3047588     DOI: 10.1038/335541a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  17 in total

1.  Sex-ratio-distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host.

Authors:  F M Jiggins; G D Hurst; M E Majerus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer.

Authors:  E Post; R Langvatn; M C Forchhammer; N C Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Using the satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to explain ranging patterns in a lek-breeding antelope: the importance of scale.

Authors:  Jakob Bro-Jørgensen; Molly E Brown; Nathalie Pettorelli
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Interspecific and intraspecific competition as causes of direct and delayed density dependence in a fluctuating vole population.

Authors:  T F Hansen; N C Stenseth; H Henttonen; J Tast
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Why spacing behavior does not stabilize density in cyclic populations of microtine rodents.

Authors:  Edward J Heske; Søren Bondrup-Nielsen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Contrasting effects of large density changes on relative testes size in fluctuating populations of sympatric vole species.

Authors:  Ines Klemme; Carl D Soulsbury; Heikki Henttonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour.

Authors:  Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Effects of the distribution of female primates on the number of males.

Authors:  Laurel Mariah Carnes; Charles L Nunn; Rebecca J Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Activity predicts male reproductive success in a polygynous lizard.

Authors:  J Scott Keogh; Daniel W A Noble; Eleanor E Wilson; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent.

Authors:  Georgia Ward-Fear; Gregory P Brown; David Pearson; Richard Shine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.