Krittiya Chiangkul1, Poramad Trivalairat1, Watchariya Purivirojkul1. 1. Animal Systematics and Ecology Speciality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Placobdelloides Sawyer, 1986 [20] is a genus of glossiphoniid leeches, currently composed of 16 species found worldwide, i.e., in Africa (Placobdelloides fimbriata Johansson, 1909 [6]; P. jaegerskioeldi Johansson, 1909; P. multistriata Johansson, 1909 [13, 19]), Australia and the United States, eastward to India (P. fulva Harding, 1921 [17]; P. emydae Harding, 1924 [4, 10]; P. undulata Harding, 1924 [11]; P. horai Baugh, 1960 [2]; P. indica Baugh, 1960 [2]), and Southeast Asia (P. siamensis Oka, 1917 in China and Thailand [1]; P. okadai Oka, 1925 [18] in China; P. okai Soós, 1969 [22]; P. stellapapillosa Goverdich et al., 2002 [9] in Malaysia and Singapore), and throughout Australia and New Zealand (P. octostriata Grube, 1866 [24]; P. maorica Benham, 1907 [15]; P. bancrofti Best, 1931 [16]; P. bdellae Ingram, 1957 [12]). Lacking a jaw, they usually feed with a protrusible proboscis and are predacious or sanguivorous, or both, on a variety of prey living in nearby water systems, such as shrimps, waterfowl, fish, amphibians, turtles, crocodiles or mammals (P. octostriata Grube, 1866; P. maorica Benham, 1907; P. bancrofti Best, 1931; P. bdellae Ingram, 1947) [9, 17, 20, 21, 24].In Thailand, turtles are commonly used in the practice of religious merit release and are believed to grant a long life to the releaser. Frequently found species of turtles include Southeast Asian Box Turtle (Cuora amboinensis Daudin, 1802), Yellow-headed Temple Turtle (Heosemys annandalii Boulenger, 1903), Black Marsh Turtle (Siebenrockiella crassicollis Gray, 1831) and Red-eared Slider TurtleTrachemys scripta elegans Wied-Neuwied, 1839 (alien species). Snail-eating turtles are freshwater species belonging to the Malayemys genus, with three species members, Malayemys macrocephala Gray 1859, M. subtrijuga Schlegel and Müller 1845 and M. khoratensis Ihlow, Vamberger, Flecks, Hartmann, Cota, Makchai, Meewattana, Dawson, Kheng, Rödder and Fritz 2016, from Southeast Asia [3, 7, 23]. There have been almost no reports on their infection with leeches before; however, in this study, these turtles from various areas were found to be heavily infected with freshwater leeches, subsequently identified as Placobdelloides siamensis.The Siamese shield leech P. siamensis was originally described in the early 20th century as Hemiclepsis siamensis Oka, 1917 from the black marsh turtle Bellie crassicollis Gray, 1831 (currently, S. crassicollis), which originated from Lampam, Patalung, Thailand, before having been reclassified to the current name by Sawyer in 1986 [1, 5, 20]. Even though Siddall et al. [21] have previously sequenced and reported this species from Wat Bovorn, Bangkok, Thailand, they did not describe the host species, nor did they update the data. Therefore, in this study, we examined information on P. siamensis to expand the original description by updating the known morphology and host range in Thailand, and including the ban on the release of turtles to prevent the spread of P. siamensis.
Materials and methods
Leech preparation
Snail-eating turtles (Malayemys macrocephala = 18; M. Subtrijuga = 12) and Heosemys annandalii were collected from ponds at Kasetsart University, Bangkok Province, Thailand (13°50′53.6ʺ N, 100°33′47.3ʺ E) from February to July 2017. Turtles were collected by hand at night. Some leeches were removed using forceps and then stored in 70% ethanol for identification, while others were stored in absolute ethanol.
Morphological study
Approximately 3852 individual leeches were collected, from 20 host specimens, 9 M. khoratensis from Montri Sumontha (Udon Thani District, Udon Thani Province, 17°36′55.5ʺ N, 102°81′42.7ʺ E) and 11 Cuora amboinensis from the Phraya Suren Temple market, Bangkok Province (13°52′23.6ʺ N, 100°42′03.6ʺ E). For morphological characterization, leeches were examined for eye number and placement, annulation, digestive system (including the number and structure of gastric ceca), and reproductive system under a DVM6 digital microscope (Leica Microsystems (SEA) Pte. Ltd.) at a 2350× magnification. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), leeches were preserved in absolute alcohol, then dried using the critical point dry (CPD) technique, coated in gold, and examined under a microscope.
Molecular analysis
Leeches were cut into two pieces equally; the anterior part was kept in an absolute ethanol. Posterior part was used for DNA isolation with the DP304-02 TIANamp Genomic DNS, following the protocol given for the purification of total DNA from animal tissue (spin column). For the proteinase K treatment step, tissue samples were lysed for several hours at 56 °C. DNA was eluted from the spin column with 150 μL of buffer.Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were prepared using EP0402 TAQ DNA Polymerase. Primers were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies and were comprised of two primers each for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (CO-I) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit I (ND-1), as specified by Light and Siddall (1999) [14]. Specifically, the CO-I primers were LCO1490 (5′–GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G–3′) and HCO2198 (5′–TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA AAT CA–3′). The ND-I primers were LND300 (5′–TGG CAG AGT AGT GCA TTA GG–3′) and HND1932 (5′–CCT CAG CAA AAT CAA ATG G–3′). Final volume of PCR reactions was 30 mL with 3 mL of leech genomic DNA added per reaction. DNA was amplified under the following PCR conditions: 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s; 72 °C for 7 min.
Statistical analysis
PCR products were purified and sequenced using either the HCO2198 and LCO1490 primers for the CO-I products or the HND1932 and LND300 for the ND-I products by Macrogen Korea. The sequences obtained were submitted to GenBank (Table 1). Comparative sequences were retrieved from GenBank. The DNA sequences were aligned using ClustalW version 1.83 software and analyzed using MEGA6 version 6 software for Maximum likelihood analyses, and MrBayes version 3.1.2 software for Bayesian analysis.
Table 1.
GenBank accession numbers for leech sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis of Placobdelloides.
Taxon
GenBank accession numbers
COI
ND1
Ingroup
AN000016CE
MH777419
MH777409
AN000017CE
MH777420
MH777413
AN000018CE
MH777418
MH777411
AN000021CE
MH777415
MH777412
AN000022CE
MH777417
MH777410
AN000023CE
MH777416
MH777414
Placobdelloides jaegerskioeldi
AY962463
AY962450
Placobdelloides multistriata
DQ414338
DQ414383
Placobdelloides siamensis
AY962449
AY962462
Outgroup
Alboglossiphonia heteroclite
AF116016
AY047339
Alboglossiphonia quadrata
AY962455
AY962441
Alboglossiphonia weberi
AY962453
AY962440
Batracobdelloides tricarinata
AY962457
AY962445
Glossiphonia baicalensis
AY047329
AY047355
Glossiphonia complanate
MF458715
AY047345
Glossiphonia concolor
AY962458
AY962446
Glossiphonia elegans
AY047322
AY047335
Glossiphonia verrucata
AY962459
AY962447
Helobdella fusca
AF329038
AF329061
Helobdella robusta
MF067148
MF067201
Hemiclepsis marginata
AF003259
AY047336
Hirudo medicinalis
HQ333517
KU672396
Marsupiobdella africana
AF116015
AY047347
Placobdella montifera
MF067129
MF067212
Placobdella pediculate
MF067121
MF067222
Theromyzon bifarium
AY047330
AY047356
Theromyzon tessulatum
AY047318
AY047338
GenBank accession numbers for leech sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis of Placobdelloides.Pairwise p-distance values of the COI-ND1 gene within and among 20 species of the Glossiphoniidae family, Hirudo medicinalis and the sequences (AN000016CE, AN000017CE, AN000018CE, AN000021CE, AN000022CE and AN000023CE) identified in this study.Maximum likelihood analyses consisted of 2000 replicates of tree search with 25 initial GAMMA rate categories and final optimization using four GAMMA shape categories; bootstrap values were calculated using 2000 pseudoreplicates of the rapid bootstrap algorithm. And Bayesian analysis was run for 2 million generations with tree sampled every 100 generations, with the general time reversible (GTR) model and GAMMA distribution of nucleotide rates for all partitions. Burn-in was set to 10%.
Results
Description
Specimens were determined to belong to Placobdelloides 1986 and were characterized as triannulate in the mid-body, with one pair of eyes on somite III, a terminal mouth pore, a crop with seven pairs of gastric ceca, a gonopore between two annuli, a caudal sucker slightly over the half body width, and cocoons and eggs attached directly to both the ventral surface of an adult and to the substrate [1, 8, 20].
Type host: Black Marsh Turtle, Siebenrockiella crassicollis (Gray, 1831) Mertens et al., 1934Additional hosts: Southeast Asian Box Turtle (Cuora amboinensis, Daudin, 1802); Yellow-headed Temple Turtle (Heosemys annandalii, Boulenger, 1903); Mekong Snail-eating Turtle (Malayemys subtrijuga, Schlegel and Müller, 1845, Lindholm, 1931); Malayan Snail-eating Turtle (M. Macrocephala, Gray, 1859, Brophy, 2004); Khorat Snail-eating Turtle (M. Khoratensis, Ihlow, Vamberger, Flecks, Hartmann, Cota, Makchai, Meewattana, Dawson, Kheng, Rödder and Fritz 2016) (this study).Additional locality: Kasetsart University, Bangkok Province (13°50′53.6″ N, 100°33′47.3″ E), Phraya Suren Temple market, Bangkok Province (13°52′23.6″ N, 100°42′03.6″ E), Udon Thani District, Udon Thani Province (17°36′55.5″ N, 102°81’42.7″ E)Site of infection: external surfaces (carapace, head, neck, axilla, groin and tail), including inside mouth (Fig. 5)
Figure 5.
Parasitism of Placobdelloides siamensis on (A) the carapace of Malayemys subtrijuga and (B) plastron of Heosemys annandalii.
Type locality: Lampam District, Patalung Province, Thailand.Specimen deposited: Zoological Museum Kasetsart University (ZMKU), Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, ZMKU-ANN-0001-5.
External morphology
Body of mature P. siamensis an elongated oval, 25 mm in length, maximum head and body width 2.35 and 5.57 mm, respectively (Fig. 1). Entire dorsal surface rough, with numerous well-developed 5–9 longitudinal rod papillae present. No regular arrangement pattern, except a row of papillae on each side of the median line. Ventral surface entirely smooth.
Figure 1.
Dorsal surface (upper) and ventral surface (lower) of Placobdelloides siamensis. Ventral surface showing numerous young leeches.
Dorsal surface (upper) and ventral surface (lower) of Placobdelloides siamensis. Ventral surface showing numerous young leeches.Oral sucker small (average 1.86 mm diameter), with mouth opening at terminal portion and numerous pits inside (Fig. 2A). One pair of eyes, located on dorsal surface of somite III (Fig. 2B). Eyes touch. Male genital pore situated in furrow between annuli 22 (3rd ring of somite X) and 23 (1st ring of somite XI) (Fig. 3). Female pore lies in furrow of somite XI between annuli 24 (1st ring) and 25 (2nd ring). Two annuli separate the gonopores, and anus separates last annulus and caudal sucker. Caudal sucker over half of body width (average 3.00 mm in diameter), no pits.
Figure 2.
Anterior part of Placobdelloides siamensis. (A) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) showing oral sucker, numerous pits inside and mouth at terminal lip, (B) Dorsal surface showing eye placement at somite III. The dorsal color is uniformly brownish-gray, with randomly distributed dark brown, yellow, and green spots. The dorsal median line is yellowish, between four pairs of scarlet ovals. On the margin, brown, yellow, and green spots are present along the caudal sucker. The ventral surface is transparent.
Figure 3.
Scanning electron micrograph of the ventral surface of Placobdelloides siamensis showing the arrangement of gonopores. Upper image is the male gonopore and lower is female.
Anterior part of Placobdelloides siamensis. (A) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) showing oral sucker, numerous pits inside and mouth at terminal lip, (B) Dorsal surface showing eye placement at somite III. The dorsal color is uniformly brownish-gray, with randomly distributed dark brown, yellow, and green spots. The dorsal median line is yellowish, between four pairs of scarlet ovals. On the margin, brown, yellow, and green spots are present along the caudal sucker. The ventral surface is transparent.Scanning electron micrograph of the ventral surface of Placobdelloides siamensis showing the arrangement of gonopores. Upper image is the male gonopore and lower is female.
Internal anatomy
Blunt elongated cylindrical proboscis from terminal lip of oral sucker to posterior proboscis sheath, followed by elongated esophagus, to which discrete compact bunch of salivary glands and diverticulate esophagus glands open. Seven pairs of diverticulated crop ceca, with last pair extending posteriorly and diverticulated into four sections. Four pairs of simple saccular intestinal, with last pair extending posteriorly to simple rectum and anus. Anus opens on dorsal surface behind the last annulus (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.
Internal anatomy of Placobdelloides siamensis.
Internal anatomy of Placobdelloides siamensis.Parasitism of Placobdelloides siamensis on (A) the carapace of Malayemys subtrijuga and (B) plastron of Heosemys annandalii.Male genital pore opens to glasses shaped sac, posteriorly to the diverticulate esophagus, and diverts to vas deferens on each side. Vas deferens posterior, opens to six pairs of curly rounded testes, each located close to the distal edge of each crop branch. Female pore situated posteriorly to male genital pore, opens to a sac which continues into elongated ovary on each side. Typically, ovaries coiled anteriorly the first crop caeca; however, after mating and egg producing, ovaries are elongated posteriorly from numerous eggs inside them.The Bayesian trees of the COI–ND1 genes of the Glossiphoniid leeches had high probability support values for the monophyly of AN000016CE, AN000017CE, AN000018CE, AN000021CE, AN000022CE, AN000023CE, P. siamensis, and P. Jaegerskioeldi, but also revealed non-monophyly of P. multistriatus (Fig. 6). The maximum-likelihood trees also yielded monophyletic groups, similar to the Bayesian trees, but the data were different for P. jaegerskioeldi and P. multistriatus. The barcoding results also confirmed that AN000016CE, AN000017CE, AN000018CE, AN000021CE, AN000022CE, and AN000023CE were P. siamensis.
Figure 6.
Phylogeny analysis of the COI-ND1 gene of glossiphoniid leeches (Table 2): the upper diagram is the Bayesian analysis; lower is the maximum likelihood analysis.
Phylogeny analysis of the COI-ND1 gene of glossiphoniid leeches (Table 2): the upper diagram is the Bayesian analysis; lower is the maximum likelihood analysis.
Table 2.
Pairwise p-distance values of the COI-ND1 gene within and among 20 species of the Glossiphoniidae family, Hirudo medicinalis and the sequences (AN000016CE, AN000017CE, AN000018CE, AN000021CE, AN000022CE and AN000023CE) identified in this study.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Hirudo medicinalis
Glossiphonia concolor
0.802
Alboglossiphonia quadrata
0.536
0.457
Alboglossiphonia heteroclite
0.569
0.538
0.288
Alboglossiphonia weberi
0.518
0.428
0.205
0.193
Helobdella robusta
0.615
0.498
0.270
0.325
0.260
Helobdella fusca
0.599
0.525
0.252
0.330
0.254
0.185
Placobdelloides siamensis
0.514
0.435
0.249
0.294
0.217
0.253
0.269
These studied sequences
0.5120.561
0.4310.457
0.2450.288
0.2940.347
0.2180.262
0.2500.295
0.2690.310
0.0070.075
0.0020.081
Placobdella montifera
0.554
0.473
0.263
0.336
0.257
0.218
0.239
0.215
0.2170.260
Placobdella pediculate
0.531
0.482
0.257
0.317
0.233
0.259
0.260
0.222
0.2240.260
0.198
Glossiphonia elegans
0.507
0.340
0.222
0.262
0.175
0.259
0.276
0.202
0.2020.247
0.235
0.220
Glossiphonia verrucata
0.538
0.336
0.226
0.302
0.197
0.276
0.297
0.220
0.2180.257
0.256
0.253
0.123
Glossiphonia baicalensis
0.509
0.327
0.211
0.272
0.185
0.256
0.269
0.205
0.2010.249
0.224
0.231
0.108
0.091
Glossiphonia complanate
0.494
0.339
0.217
0.273
0.179
0.257
0.272
0.189
0.1890.229
0.232
0.220
0.101
0.107
0.091
Marsupiobdella africana
0.522
0.466
0.262
0.294
0.229
0.245
0.262
0.191
0.1930.243
0.226
0.229
0.214
0.242
0.222
0.220
Batracobdelloides tricarinata
0.554
0.452
0.257
0.317
0.229
0.260
0.240
0.202
0.2030.238
0.215
0.236
0.217
0.225
0.218
0.195
0.206
Hemiclepsis marginata
0.520
0.455
0.224
0.317
0.225
0.272
0.256
0.194
0.1930.238
0.222
0.226
0.214
0.221
0.199
0.210
0.218
0.199
Placobdelloides multistriatus
0.500
0.431
0.214
0.275
0.187
0.232
0.225
0.171
0.1710.218
0.190
0.189
0.199
0.197
0.177
0.175
0.177
0.170
0.181
Placobdelloides jaegerskioeldi
0.507
0.424
0.235
0.291
0.198
0.254
0.263
0.166
0.1650.205
0.202
0.210
0.191
0.190
0.186
0.182
0.197
0.194
0.181
0.142
Theromyzon bifarium
0.518
0.414
0.210
0.292
0.191
0.239
0.245
0.158
0.1560.199
0.191
0.191
0.178
0.179
0.179
0.166
0.186
0.185
0.162
0.144
0.152
Theromyzon tessulatum
0.522
0.419
0.214
0.294
0.194
0.242
0.249
0.160
0.1600.201
0.194
0.193
0.179
0.183
0.181
0.169
0.189
0.186
0.166
0.144
0.155
0.003
Discussion
This is the first record of P. siamensis from C. amboinensis, H. annandalii, M. macrocephala, M. subtrijuga, and M. khoratensis. This leech has currently been recorded from six species of turtles from the same family (Geoemydidae).In addition, this is the first record of P. siamensis from Udon Thani (northeastern province) in Thailand. The leech was previously reported only in Patalung (southern province) and Bangkok (central province) in Thailand, as well as in Nanking, China [20, 21]. Even though this leech has been shown to feed on numerous Geoemydidae turtles, as mentioned above, there have been no records that it is able to feed on other families, as found in this study. Moreover, it tends to spread throughout Thailand following its host distributions.The morphological characters that separated this P. siamensis from it congeners are one pair of eyes; spines at the proboscis subterminal; mouth terminal on oral sucker; absent plaque in neck region; gonopores located in furrow and separated by two annuli; distinctly triannulated mid-body segments; crop with seven pairs and branched ceca; caudal sucker slightly over half maximum body width; and strongly dorsal papillae. The specimens collected in this study almost matched the description of P. siamensis (in alcohol) by Annandale [1], except the male and female gonopores. The male gonopore had been described as situated between annuli 25 and 26 (somite XI and XII), while it was situated between annuli 22 and 23 (somite X and XI) in this study.The female gonopore had been described as situated between annuli 27 and 28 (somite XII), while it was situated between annuli 24 and 25 (somite XI) in this study. Since Annandale [1] used preserved specimens, no information on coloration in life was provided. The report by Siddall et al. [21] on the sequencing of P. siamensis from Wat Bovorn did not describe morphological details, nor the host. Collection of a large number of live leeches in this study allowed us to describe the external coloration and morphology.All specimens examined were mature, with developed testisacs and ovisacs present. Some specimens carried cocoons or young on the posterior ventral surface, as in the original description. In this study, some cocoons were attached to the substrate. The number of eggs was documented to be between 173 and 412 per individual in 14 specimens.In the original description, Annandale [1] hesitated to classify this species into Hemiclepsis or Placobdella because of the oval shape, one pair of eyes, a pattern of numerous irregular papillae, gonopores separated by two annuli, and cocoons carried on the ventral side. Finally, it was placed in Hemiclepsis based on the distinctly posterior position of the mouth, although Hemiclepsis is characterized by 9–11 pairs of crop ceca, 2–3 pairs of eyes, gonopores separated by two annuli, and the attachment of cocoons to the substrate [20].Sawyer [20] subsequently moved H. siamensis to P. siamensis because of the following similarities: one pair of eyes, an esophageal organ, seven pairs of crop ceca, a terminal mouth pore, gonopores separated by two annuli, and a combination of the parental care behavior, either carrying cocoons on the ventral surface or attached to the substrate.Although Annandale [1] and Sawyer [20] clearly described the morphology of P. siamensis, this study provides a more complete overview of the morphological structure, coloration pattern, and parental care behaviors of P. siamensis, thus leading to a better understanding of its actual phylogenetic position within glossiphoniid leeches.