Literature DB >> 3047448

Effects of prophylactic lidocaine in suspected acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from the randomized, controlled trials.

S MacMahon1, R Collins, R Peto, R W Koster, S Yusuf.   

Abstract

The effects of prophylactic lidocaine hydrochloride on early ventricular fibrillation and death in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were investigated in an overview of 14 randomized trials. During follow-up intervals of one to four hours in the trials of intramuscular lidocaine infusion (6961 patients) and 24 to 48 hours in the trials of intravenous lidocaine injection (2194 patients), a total of 103 cases of ventricular fibrillation and 137 deaths were recorded. Overall, allocation to lidocaine was associated with a reduction in the odds of ventricular fibrillation of about one third, with a 95% confidence interval that ranged from a 3% to a 56% reduction. There was no evidence of any beneficial effect on early mortality; indeed, the odds of early death were about one third greater among patients allocated lidocaine, though this difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, 2% reduction to 95% increase). Because of the small numbers of reported events, the short follow-up periods, and the unavailability of data for some specific causes of death, even an overview of all the trial results does not provide good evidence as to whether prophylactic lidocaine is likely to be helpful or harmful. To answer this question reliably, future trials will need to involve large numbers of patients and prolonged follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3047448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  35 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.

Authors:  L R Harrold; T S Field; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Pharmacological Therapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Current and Practical Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Amiodarone as compared to lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Bramah N Singh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  Gesche Jürgens; Niels A Graudal; Jens P Kampmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Dysrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction: how to treat, when to treat, and when not to treat.

Authors:  J A Lopez; A Massumi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1992

Review 7.  Antiarrhythmic therapies for the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  F A McAlister; K K Teo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Therapeutic fashion and publication bias: the case of anti-arrhythmic drugs in heart attack.

Authors:  John Hampton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Risk-benefit assessment of antiarrhythmic drugs. An epidemiological perspective.

Authors:  L Friedman; E Schron; S Yusuf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  The management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Saltissi; S S Mushahwar
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.