Literature DB >> 30474450

Budget impact analysis of secukinumab versus adalimumab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Timo Purmonen1, Soili Törmälehto2,3, Hanna Wahlman1, Kari Puolakka4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biologic treatments have enhanced the treatment outcomes of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Until recently, TNF-alpha-inhibitors have been the only biologics approved for the treatment of active AS. The objective of this study was to assess the potential financial impact of the first non-TNF-alpha biologic secukinumab (fully human IL-17A-inhibitor) vs adalimumab (TNF-alpha-inhibitor) in the treatment of AS in Finland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this model-based budget impact analysis, patients were treated either with secukinumab (150 mg) or adalimumab (40 mg). The number of patients and market share of different biologics were based on national reimbursement registry data. Adalimumab was the most commonly used biologic treatment for AS, and in the base case analysis all adalimumab patients are assumed to switch to secukinumab. Response rates were based on a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between secukinumab and adalimumab. Patients not achieving response were switched to another biologic treatment.
RESULTS: Treating AS patients with secukinumab instead of adalimumab leads to potential savings of 18.2 million euros within a 5-year time period. The total costs within the follow-up time were 59.5 million euros and 77.7 million euros with and without secukinumab, respectively. According to sensitivity analyses, a higher adoption rate of secukinumab corresponds to higher potential savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab is a cost-saving treatment option compared with adalimumab in the treatment of AS in Finland. More patients could be treated with a biologic by allocating resources more efficiently.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adalimumab; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS); I10; I19; IL-17A-inhibitor; ankylosing spondylitis (AS); anti-TNF-alpha agent; budget impact analysis; economic evaluation; rheumatology; secukinumab; treatment costs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30474450     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1551227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  3 in total

Review 1.  Real-world evidence in rheumatic diseases: relevance and lessons learnt.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Secukinumab: A Review in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Evidence for the Use of Secukinumab in Patients with Radiographic and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in the Last 5 Years.

Authors:  María Aparicio; Carlos A Guillén-Astete; Clementina López-Medina; Carlos Sastre; Fernando J Rodríguez Martínez
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-11-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.