RATIONALE: Field measurement of denitrification in agricultural ecosystems using the 15 N gas flux method has been limited by poor sensitivity because current isotope ratio mass spectrometry is not precise enough to detect low 15 N2 fluxes in the presence of a high atmospheric N2 background. For laboratory studies, detection limits are improved by incubating soils in closed systems and under N2 -depleted atmospheres. METHODS: We developed a new procedure to conduct the 15 N gas flux method suitable for field application using an artificially N2 -depleted atmosphere to improve the detection limit at the given precision of mass spectrometry. Laboratory experiments with and without 15 N-labelling and using different flushing strategies were conducted to develop a suitable field method. Subsequently, this method was tested in the field and results were compared with those obtained from the conventional 15 N gas flux method. RESULTS: Results of the two methods were in close agreement showing that the denitrification rates determined were not biased by the flushing procedure. Best sensitivity for N2 + N2 O fluxes was 10 ppb, which was 80-fold better than that of the reference method. Further improvement can be achieved by lowering the N2 background concentration below the values established in the present study. CONCLUSIONS: In view of this progress in sensitivity, the new method will be suitable to measure denitrification dynamics in the field beyond peak events.
RATIONALE: Field measurement of denitrification in agricultural ecosystems using the 15 N gas flux method has been limited by poor sensitivity because current isotope ratio mass spectrometry is not precise enough to detect low 15 N2 fluxes in the presence of a high atmospheric N2 background. For laboratory studies, detection limits are improved by incubating soils in closed systems and under N2 -depleted atmospheres. METHODS: We developed a new procedure to conduct the 15 N gas flux method suitable for field application using an artificially N2 -depleted atmosphere to improve the detection limit at the given precision of mass spectrometry. Laboratory experiments with and without 15 N-labelling and using different flushing strategies were conducted to develop a suitable field method. Subsequently, this method was tested in the field and results were compared with those obtained from the conventional 15 N gas flux method. RESULTS: Results of the two methods were in close agreement showing that the denitrification rates determined were not biased by the flushing procedure. Best sensitivity for N2 + N2 O fluxes was 10 ppb, which was 80-fold better than that of the reference method. Further improvement can be achieved by lowering the N2 background concentration below the values established in the present study. CONCLUSIONS: In view of this progress in sensitivity, the new method will be suitable to measure denitrification dynamics in the field beyond peak events.
Authors: Daniel I Warner; Clemens Scheer; Johannes Friedl; David W Rowlings; Christian Brunk; Peter R Grace Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 4.379