| Literature DB >> 30473788 |
Min Lu1,2, Sydney M Sanderson3, Amelia Zessin1,3, Kathleen A Ashcraft3, Lee W Jones4,5,6, Mark W Dewhirst7, Jason W Locasale3,6, David S Hsu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While self-reported exercise is associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrence in colorectal cancer, the molecular mechanisms underpinning this relationship are unknown. Furthermore, the effect of exercise on intratumoral metabolic processes has not been investigated in detail in human cancers. In our current study, we generated six colorectal patient patient-derived xenografts (CRC PDXs) models and treated each PDX to voluntary wheel running (exercise) for 6-8 weeks or no exposure to the wheel (control). A comprehensive metabolomics analysis was then performed on the PDXs to identify exercise induced changes in the tumor that were associated with slower growth.Entities:
Keywords: Central carbon metabolism; Colorectal cancer; Exercise; Mitochondrial metabolism; Patient-derived xenograft
Year: 2018 PMID: 30473788 PMCID: PMC6237036 DOI: 10.1186/s40170-018-0190-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Metab ISSN: 2049-3002
Fig. 1The effect of exercise on tumor growth in six different CRC PDX models. All CRC PDX were randomized into control and exercise treatment groups, with body weight and tumor size measured two or three times per week once treatment began. N = (number of mice used in this group) in each PDX models (a–f). Significance for tumor size difference at the endpoint between control and exercise groups in each PDX model was determined by unpaired Student’s t test (* indicates p < 0.05) (a–c) CRC240, BRPC12–146 and CRC361 had no response to exercise treatment (D-F), while CRC282, CRC370 and CRC344 had a significant response to exercise treatment with a decrease in tumor growth (all p < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test)
Demographics of patient-derived xenografts of CRC240, CRC282, CRC344, CRC361, CRC370 and BRPC12-146
| CRC240 | CRC282 | CRC370 | CRC344 | CRC361 | BRPC12–146 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | Male | Male | Male | Female | Male |
| Age | 75 | 67 | 57 | 55 | 82 | 52 |
| Race | Caucasian | Caucasian | Caucasian | Caucasian | Caucasian | Caucasian |
| Histology | Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma | Well differentiated adenocarcinoma | Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma | Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma | Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma | Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma |
| Primary | Colon | Rectal | Colon | Colon | Colon | Colon |
| Metastatic site | Liver | Liver | Liver | Peritoneum | None | None |
| Microsatellite status | MSS | MSS | MSS | MSS | MSI | MSI |
Fig. 2Tumors from exercised mice exhibit globally altered metabolic profiles compared to tumors from control mice. a Volcano plot comparing fold changes for metabolites between control and exercise groups across the six CRC PDX models. There were 47 significantly altered metabolites (p < 0.05, paired Student’s t test). b Heat map of significantly altered metabolites between exercise and control groups in the six CRC PDX models. The significantly altered metabolites are displayed using unsupervised hierarchal clustering. c Corresponding impacted pathways as determined by the list of 47 significantly altered metabolites. d–g Key metabolic pathways broken down by individual metabolites. Error bars are representative of standard error of mean (SEM); * indicates p < 0.05, paired Student’s t test
Fig. 3Exercise-responsive tumors demonstrate distinct metabolic differences. a Volcano plot showing fold changes in metabolites between control and exercise groups in the three exercise-responsive PDX models. Significantly altered metabolites (p < 0.05) determined using paired Student’s t test. b Heat map of integrated intensity values of the significantly altered metabolites between responsive control and exercise groups. c Corresponding impacted pathways as determined by the 15 significantly altered metabolites. d–h Key metabolic pathways broken down by individual metabolites. Error bars are representative of standard error of mean (SEM). * indicates p < 0.05, paired Student’s t test
Fig. 4Exercise-responsive tumors exhibit differential metabolic responses to exercise compared to non-responsive tumors. a Volcano plot for fold changes of metabolites between exercise groups of the three responsive and three non-responsive physical activity PDX models. There were 24 significantly altered metabolites (p < 0.05, paired Student’s t test). b Heat map composed of fold changes (exercise versus control) of the 24 significantly altered metabolites between exercise-responsive and exercise non-responsive PDX models, displayed using unsupervised hierarchical clustering. c Oxidative stress as measured by ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione levels. Error bars are standard error of the mean (SEM). d–f Key metabolic pathways broken down by individual metabolites, segregated into four experimental subgroups. Error bars are representative of standard error of mean (SEM). * indicates p < 0.05, paired Student’s t test. g Relative fold changes in phosphocreatine levels between control and exercise groups, compared between exercise-responsive and exercise-nonresponsive tumors. Error bars are representative of standard error of mean (SEM). * indicates p < 0.05, paired Student’s t test