Literature DB >> 30473638

Histologic Changes in Prostate Cancer Detected Subsequent to the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Prostate Cancer Screening Recommendation.

Carl A Olsson1,2,3, Hugh J Lavery1, Kamlesh K Yadav1, Ann E Anderson1,2, Deepak Kapoor1,2.   

Abstract

We report changes in the histopathology of prostate cancer diagnosed in a large urology group practice after the final United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Grade D recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening. All prostate biopsies performed from 2011 through 2015 in a large urology group practice were retrospectively reviewed; 2012 was excluded as a transition year. The changes in biopsy data in years following the USPSTF decision (2013-2015) were then compared with baseline (2011). A total of 10,944 biopsies were evaluated during the study period. Positive biopsy rates rose from 39.1% at baseline to 45.2% in 2015 (P < 0.01) with a marked shift toward more aggressive cancer throughout the study period. The absolute number of patients presenting with Gleason Grade Group 4 or 5 increased from 155/year at baseline to 231, 297, and 285 in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively (P < 0.05), unrelated to age or racial changes over time. Black men represented 16% of the cohort. Since the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening, trends toward a substantial upward grade migration and increased volume of cancers were noted in a cohort of nearly 11,000 patients in a real-world clinical practice. Additionally, continuing reductions in cancer detection in the United States may exacerbate these trends.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer screening; Prostate cancer, grade migration; Prostate cancer, histopathology

Year:  2018        PMID: 30473638      PMCID: PMC6241894          DOI: 10.3909/riu0815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  18 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice.

Authors:  Franklin D Gaylis; Jae E Choi; Zachary Hamilton; Paul Dato; Edward Cohen; Renee Calabrese; Hilary Prime; Aaron Rosenbaum; Andrew Karim Kader
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Increase in Prostate Cancer Distant Metastases at Diagnosis in the United States.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Paul Nguyen; Jialin Mao; Joshua Halpern; Jonathan Shoag; Jason D Wright; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Douglas K Owens; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Aaron B Caughey; Karina W Davidson; Chyke A Doubeni; Mark Ebell; John W Epling; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Albert L Siu; Chien-Wen Tseng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Muhammad Mamdani; Girish S Kulkarni; Antonio Finelli; Robert J Hamilton; John Trachtenberg; Alexandre R Zlotta; Andrew Evans; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Ants Toi; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Stacey A Fedewa; Jiemin Ma; Rebecca Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Otis Brawley; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Grade D Recommendation: Assessment of Evaluations for Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsies in a Large Urology Group Practice Following Statement Revision.

Authors:  Kathleen F McGinley; Gregory C McMahon; Gordon A Brown
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015
View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact on prostate cancer clinical presentation after non-screening policies at a tertiary-care medical center- a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tarek Ajami; Jaime Durruty; Claudia Mercader; Leonardo Rodriguez; Maria J Ribal; Antonio Alcaraz; Antoni Vilaseca
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.