Literature DB >> 30473458

Management of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Analysis of Trends and Short-Term Complications Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Anirudh K Gowd1, Gregory L Cvetanovich2, Joseph N Liu3, David R Christian1, Brandon C Cabarcas1, Michael L Redondo1, Nikhil N Verma4, Adam B Yanke1, Brian J Cole1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide updated surgical trends of cartilage procedures differentiated by the classic groups of palliative, repair, and restorative modalities.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2010-2016 for the following cartilage procedures: chondroplasty, microfracture, arthroscopic osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation, open osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation, and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Demographic variables and short-term (30-day) complications were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze trends over time.
RESULTS: A total of 15,609 procedures performed between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. On average, 342.2 ± 27.9 cartilage procedures were performed per 100,000 operations. There was a linear increase in the management of overall cartilage procedures per 100,000 operations (P = .002). There were also linear increases in arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation, arthroscopic osteochondral allograft transplantation, open osteochondral autograft transplantation, open osteochondral allograft transplantation, and autologous chondrocyte implantation (P < .001, P = .037, P = .001, P = .006, and P = .002, respectively). Meniscectomy was the most frequently performed concomitant procedure (9.7%-64.2% of cases). Chondroplasty and microfracture showed no change in frequency over time (P = .140 and P = .720, respectively). The overall complication rate was 2.1% for chondroplasty, 1.4% for microfracture, 1.8% for arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation, 1.0% for arthroscopic osteochondral allograft transplantation, 1.4% for open osteochondral autograft transplantation, 1.1% for open osteochondral allograft transplantation, and 0.75% for autologous chondrocyte implantation. Deep vein thrombosis was the most common complication, occurring in 0.4% to 1.0% of cases. No statistically significant difference was found in complication rates between procedures (P = .105).
CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage restoration is becoming an increasingly popular modality to address chondral defects. Minimal complication rates suggest that these procedures may be safely performed concomitantly with other interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective database analysis.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30473458     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.07.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Electrospun PCL-PLGA for Sustained Delivery of Kartogenin.

Authors:  Steven Elder; John Graham Roberson; James Warren; Robert Lawson; Daniel Young; Sean Stokes; Matthew K Ross
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Time Matters: Knee Cartilage Defect Expansion and High-Grade Lesion Formation while Awaiting Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

Authors:  Robert J Pettit; Joshua S Everhart; Alex C DiBartola; Ryan E Blackwell; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Cartilage Restoration of Bipolar Lesions Within the Patellofemoral Joint Delays Need for Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Rates of Failure.

Authors:  Anirudh K Gowd; Alexander E Weimer; Danielle E Rider; Edward C Beck; Avinesh Agarwalla; Lisa K O'Brien; Michael J Alaia; Cristin M Ferguson; Brian R Waterman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 4.  Managing Chondral Lesions: A Literature Review and Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines.

Authors:  Sumit Banerjee; K Santosh Sahanand
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Differences in the Demographics and Preferred Management of Knee Cartilage Injuries in Soccer Players Across FIFA Centers of Excellence.

Authors:  Niv Marom; Tyler Warner; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of Focal Cartilage Defect Treatments in Middle-Aged Versus Younger Patients.

Authors:  Ralph M Jeuken; Pieter P W van Hugten; Alex K Roth; Ufuk Tan Timur; Tim A E J Boymans; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; William D Bugbee; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-15

7.  Differences in Clinical and Functional Outcomes Between Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for the Treatment of Focal Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  John R Matthews; Joseph M Brutico; Daniel T Abraham; Jeremy C Heard; Bradford S Tucker; Fotios P Tjoumakaris; Kevin B Freedman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-09

8.  Surgical Trends in Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee, Analysis of the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims Database from 2005-2014.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bonazza; Dallas M Smuin; Rajat Joshi; Djibril Ba; Guodong Liu; Douglas L Leslie; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.