| Literature DB >> 30473207 |
Abstract
Natural Cycle IVF (NC-IVF) with and without modifications is being increasingly performed. NC-IVF and conventional gonadotropin-stimulated IVF (cIVF) should not be understood as competing treatments, but as complementary treatments with different target groups and to some extent other indications. NC-IVF is particularly interesting for couples who wish to save money, wish a treatment with as few risks as possible and for women who would like to avoid selection and cryopreservation of embryos. NC-IVF therefore contributes to the concept of individualized and patient-oriented therapy. The time to pregnancy is slightly longer than with conventional IVF. NC-IVF is particularly suitable for younger women and for women with a very low ovarian reserve. In this article, the principles of NC-IVF, i.e. monofollicular IVF without gonadotropin stimulation, are described and the technical differences to cIVF, advantages and disadvantages, perinatal outcome and indications for NC-IVF are highlightened.Entities:
Keywords: IVF; Natural Cycle IVF; delivery rate; pregnancy rate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30473207 DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2018.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 1521-690X Impact factor: 4.690