Literature DB >> 30473137

Virtual trial to evaluate the robustness of cementless femoral stems to patient and surgical variation.

Rami M A Al-Dirini1, Saulo Martelli2, Dermot O'Rourke2, Daniel Huff3, Ju Zhang4, John G Clement5, Thor Besier4, Mark Taylor6.   

Abstract

Primary stability is essential for the success of cementless femoral stems. In this study, patient specific finite element (FE) models were used to assess changes in primary stability due to variability in patient anatomy, bone properties and stem alignment for two commonly used cementless femoral stems, Corail® and Summit® (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, USA). Computed-tomography images of the femur were obtained for 8 males and 8 females. An automated algorithm was used to determine the stem position and size which minimized the endo-cortical space, and then span the plausible surgical envelope of implant positions constrained by the endo-cortical boundary. A total of 1952 models were generated and ran, each with a unique alignment scenario. Peak hip contact and muscle forces for stair climbing were scaled to the donor's body weight and applied to the model. The primary stability was assessed by comparing the implant micromotion and peri-prosthetic strains to thresholds (150 μm and 7000 µε, respectively) above which fibrous tissue differentiation and bone damage are expected to prevail. Despite the wide range of implant positions included, FE prediction were mostly below the thresholds (medians: Corail®: 20-74 µm and 1150-2884 µε, Summit®: 25-111 µm and 860-3010 µε), but sensitivity of micromotion and interfacial strains varied across femora, with the majority being sensitive (p < 0.0029) to average bone mineral density, cranio-caudal angle, post-implantation anteversion angle and lateral offset of the femur. The results confirm the relationship between implant position and primary stability was highly dependent on the patient and the stem design used.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element modelling; Hip replacement; Implant design; Implant robustness; Patient factors; Primary stability; Surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30473137     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  2 in total

1.  In Silico Clinical Trials in the Orthopedic Device Industry: From Fantasy to Reality?

Authors:  Philippe Favre; Ghislain Maquer; Adam Henderson; Daniel Hertig; Daniel Ciric; Jeffrey E Bischoff
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Sjur Børsheim; Torbjørn Berge Kristensen; Anne Marie Fenstad; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Geir Hallan; Stein Atle Lie; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.