Literature DB >> 30472813

Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries.

Ilgi Ozturk Ertem1, Vibha Krishnamurthy2, Mphelekedzeni C Mulaudzi3, Yanina Sguassero4, Burcu Bilik1, Roopa Srinivasan2, Hakan Balta1, Ozlem Gulumser1, Geliang Gan5, Lisa Calvocoressi5, Benjamin Johnson5, Veronika Shabanova6, Brian W C Forsyth6.   

Abstract

AIM: It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two-phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries.
METHODS: The first phase of this 2011-2015 back-to-back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD.
RESULTS: The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71-0.94 and 0.69-0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups.
CONCLUSION: The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay. ©2018 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental assessment; Early childhood development; Early intervention; Monitoring; Screening; Validation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30472813      PMCID: PMC6520130          DOI: 10.1111/apa.14661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  22 in total

1.  Enrolment and baseline characteristics in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  2006-04

Review 2.  The thorny nature of predictive validity studies on screening tests for developmental-behavioral problems.

Authors:  Kevin Marks; Frances Page Glascoe; Glen P Aylward; Michael I Shevell; Paul H Lipkin; Jane K Squires
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Monitoring tools for child development: an opportunity for action.

Authors:  Sharon Goldfeld; Aisha Yousafzai
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 26.763

4.  Comparison of the ASQ and PEDS in screening for developmental delay in children presenting for primary care.

Authors:  Marjolaine M Limbos; David P Joyce
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.225

5.  Parental and professional assessment of early child development: the ASQ-3 and the Bayley-III-NL.

Authors:  Leonie J P Steenis; Marjolein Verhoeven; Dave J Hessen; Anneloes L van Baar
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Perspectives on rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy: exploring a cross-cultural view of parents from India and Canada using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

Authors:  Pranay Jindal; Joy C MacDermid; Peter Rosenbaum; Briano DiRezze; Amitesh Narayan
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 7.  Missed opportunities in surveillance and screening systems to detect developmental delay: A developing country perspective.

Authors:  Zarmeneh Aly; Fawad Taj; Shahnaz Ibrahim
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  The Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAT): the creation, validation, and reliability of a tool to assess child development in rural African settings.

Authors:  Melissa Gladstone; Gillian A Lancaster; Eric Umar; Maggie Nyirenda; Edith Kayira; Nynke R van den Broek; Rosalind L Smyth
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Developmental screening tools: feasibility of use at primary healthcare level in low- and middle-income settings.

Authors:  Vinicius Jobim Fischer; Jodi Morris; José Martines
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Development and validation of an early childhood development scale for use in low-resourced settings.

Authors:  Dana Charles McCoy; Christopher R Sudfeld; David C Bellinger; Alfa Muhihi; Geofrey Ashery; Taylor E Weary; Wafaie Fawzi; Günther Fink
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2017-02-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Applicability of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development as a Telehealth Delivered Intervention During the Pandemic.

Authors:  Ezgi Ozalp Akin; Aysen Akbas; Sidika Canan Atasoy; Merve Cicek Kanatli; Selin Ince Acici; Revan Mustafayev; Bedriye Tugba Karaaslan; Hilmi Deniz Ertem; Bahar Bingoler Pekcici; Ilgi Ertem
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  Does Place Matter? An International Comparison of Early Childhood Development Outcomes between the Metropolitan Areas of Melbourne, Australia and Montreal, Canada.

Authors:  Catherine Dea; Lise Gauvin; Michel Fournier; Sharon Goldfeld
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Caregiver parenting practices, dietary diversity knowledge, and association with early childhood development outcomes among children aged 18-29 months in Zanzibar, Tanzania: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Allyson L Russell; Elizabeth Hentschel; Isabel Fulcher; Matteo Santangelo Ravà; Gulam Abdulkarim; Omar Abdalla; Samira Said; Halima Khamis; Bethany Hedt-Gauthier; Kim Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  INTERGROWTH-21st Project international INTER-NDA standards for child development at 2 years of age: an international prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Michelle Fernandes; José Villar; Alan Stein; Eleonora Staines Urias; Cutberto Garza; Cesar G Victora; Fernando C Barros; Enrico Bertino; Manorama Purwar; Maria Carvalho; Francesca Giuliani; Katharina Wulff; Amina A Abubakar; Michael Kihara; Leila Cheikh Ismail; Luis Aranzeta; Elaine Albernaz; Naina Kunnawar; Paola Di Nicola; Roseline Ochieng; Tamsin Sandells; Sandy Savini; Sophie Temple; Elizabeth Murray; Eric O Ohuma; Michael G Gravett; Ruyan Pang; Yasmine A Jaffer; Julia Alison Noble; Adele Winsey; Ann Lambert; Aris T Papageorghiou; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Stephen Kennedy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Family-centeredness of services for young children with Down syndrome: an observational study from Turkey

Authors:  Emine Bahar Bingöler Pekcici; Ezgi Özalp Akin; Funda Akpinar; Gamze Hayran; Cansu Keleş; Betül Yağbasan; Nazmiye Kurşun; İlgi Ertem
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 0.973

6.  Hybrid type 1 effectiveness/implementation trial of the international Guide for Monitoring Child Development: protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Abhishek Raut; Revan Mustafayev; Roopa Srinivasan; Anita Chary; Ilgi Ertem; Maria Del Pilar Grazioso; Subodh Gupta; Vibha Krishnamurthy; Chunling Lu; Chetna Maliye; Ann C Miller; Bradley H Wagenaar; Peter Rohloff
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.