Literature DB >> 30472343

Cervical paraspinal muscle compartment pressure after laminoplasty: A cadaveric study.

Weerasak Singhatanadgige1, Yuttagarn Suebsombut1, K Daniel Riew2, Chotetawan Tanavalee1, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol1, Worawat Limthongkul3.   

Abstract

Axial neck pain is a common complaint after cervical laminoplasty and the causes are still not well-understood. We hypothesized that abnormal paracervical muscle compartment pressures might be one of them. The cervical paraspinal muscle compartment pressures of 10 cadavers were measured in six different areas under four different conditions. The posterior cervical area was divided into two sides: open side and hinge side. Then each side was divided into upper, middle, and lower areas. The compartment pressures of each area were measured under four different conditions: before and after dissection of posterior paravertebral (paraspinal) muscles, after laminoplasty and after laminoplasty with removal of the spinous processes. There was a statistically significant difference between the pressures after dissection versus after laminoplasty on the hinge side at all upper, middle and lower areas [p < 0.01, <0.001 and =0.009 respectively]. There was a difference in the pressures after laminoplasty between the open and hinge sides [p < 0.001, <0.001 and =0.023 respectively]. We also found the following significant differences: the pressures between before dissection and after laminoplasty on the hinge side, as well as between after laminoplasty and after removal of the spinous process on the hinge side in the upper and middle areas [p < 0.001, =0.0016 and p = 0.002, =0.023 respectively]. Cervical paraspinal muscle compartment pressures on the hinge side were significantly increased after laminoplasty. This may be a contributor to axial neck pain following laminoplasty. The pressure was then significantly decreased after removal of the spinous processes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial neck pain; Cervical; Compartment pressures; Laminoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30472343     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.11.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  2 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two Modified Open-door Laminoplasties Based on a Novel Paraspinal Approach for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Qian Guo; Yong Xu; Zhong Fang; Hanfeng Guan; Wei Xiong; Feng Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis.

Authors:  Jungho Choi; Hyung-Bok Park; Taeha Lim; Shin Wook Yi; Sooho Lee; Sukhee Park; SoYoon Park; Jungmin Yi; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.