Literature DB >> 30472038

Comparison of organ-specific endothelial cells in terms of microvascular formation and endothelial barrier functions.

Hiroyuki Uwamori1, Yuuichi Ono2, Tadahiro Yamashita3, Ken Arai4, Ryo Sudo5.   

Abstract

Every organ demonstrates specific vascular characteristics and functions maintained by interactions of endothelial cells (ECs) and parenchymal cells. Particularly, brain ECs play a central role in the formation of a functional blood brain barrier (BBB). Organ-specific ECs have their own morphological features, and organ specificity must be considered when investigating interactions between ECs and other cell types constituting a target organ. Here we constructed angiogenesis-based microvascular networks with perivascular cells in a microfluidic device setting by coculturing ECs and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Furthermore, we analyzed endothelial barrier functions as well as fundamental morphology, an essential step to build an in vitro BBB model. In particular, we used both brain microvascular ECs (BMECs) and human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) to test if organ specificity of ECs affects the formation processes and endothelial barrier functions of an engineered microvascular network. We found that microvascular formation processes differed by the source of ECs. HUVECs formed more extensive microvascular networks compared to BMECs while no differences were observed between BMECs and HUVECs in terms of both the microvascular diameter and the number of pericytes peripherally associated with the microvasculatures. To compare the endothelial barrier functions of each type of EC, we performed fluorescence dextran perfusion on constructed microvasculatures. The permeability coefficient of BMEC microvasculatures was significantly lower than that of HUVEC microvasculatures. In addition, there were significant differences in terms of tight junction protein expression. These results suggest that the organ source of ECs influences the properties of engineered microvasculature and thus is a factor to be considered in the design of organ-specific cell culture models.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiogenesis; Blood brain barrier; Microfluidics; Permeability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30472038      PMCID: PMC6294313          DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microvasc Res        ISSN: 0026-2862            Impact factor:   3.514


  29 in total

Review 1.  The dynamic blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  James Keaney; Matthew Campbell
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 2.  Endothelial/pericyte interactions.

Authors:  Annika Armulik; Alexandra Abramsson; Christer Betsholtz
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  The blood-brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Interactions of mesenchymal stem cells with endothelial cells.

Authors:  Seyed Mahdi Nassiri; Reza Rahbarghazi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  The vascular basement membrane in the healthy and pathological brain.

Authors:  Maj S Thomsen; Lisa J Routhe; Torben Moos
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 6.  The role of pericytes in angiogenesis.

Authors:  Domenico Ribatti; Beatrice Nico; Enrico Crivellato
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.203

Review 7.  Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Melanie D Sweeney; Abhay P Sagare; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Molecular signatures of tissue-specific microvascular endothelial cell heterogeneity in organ maintenance and regeneration.

Authors:  Daniel J Nolan; Michael Ginsberg; Edo Israely; Brisa Palikuqi; Michael G Poulos; Daylon James; Bi-Sen Ding; William Schachterle; Ying Liu; Zev Rosenwaks; Jason M Butler; Jenny Xiang; Arash Rafii; Koji Shido; Sina Y Rabbany; Olivier Elemento; Shahin Rafii
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Ultrastructural Characterization of the Lower Motor System in a Mouse Model of Krabbe Disease.

Authors:  Valentina Cappello; Laura Marchetti; Paola Parlanti; Silvia Landi; Ilaria Tonazzini; Marco Cecchini; Vincenzo Piazza; Mauro Gemmi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Blood-brain barrier transport machineries and targeted therapy of brain diseases.

Authors:  Jaleh Barar; Mohammad A Rafi; Mohammad M Pourseif; Yadollah Omidi
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2016-12-05
View more
  16 in total

1.  Microvessel Network Formation and Interactions with Pancreatic Islets in Three-Dimensional Chip Cultures.

Authors:  Mia H Rambøl; Edward Han; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Bioprinted microvasculature: progressing from structure to function.

Authors:  Alexis J Seymour; Ashley D Westerfield; Vincent C Cornelius; Mark A Skylar-Scott; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  Organ-On-A-Chip Models of the Blood-Brain Barrier: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakita; Kalpana Mandal; Lei Mou; Marvin Magan Mecwan; Yangzhi Zhu; Shaopei Li; Saurabh Sharma; Ana Lopez Hernandez; Huu Tuan Nguyen; Surjendu Maity; Natan Roberto de Barros; Aya Nakayama; Praveen Bandaru; Samad Ahadian; Han-Jun Kim; Rondinelli Donizetti Herculano; Eggehard Holler; Vadim Jucaud; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 4.  The vascular niche in next generation microphysiological systems.

Authors:  Makena L Ewald; Yu-Hsi Chen; Abraham P Lee; Christopher C W Hughes
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 7.517

5.  Interstitial flow enhances the formation, connectivity, and function of 3D brain microvascular networks generated within a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Max A Winkelman; Diana Y Kim; Shravani Kakarla; Alexander Grath; Nathaniel Silvia; Guohao Dai
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 7.517

Review 6.  Vascularized Biomaterials to Study Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Katharine R Bittner; Juan M Jiménez; Shelly R Peyton
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Engineering new microvascular networks on-chip: ingredients, assembly, and best practices.

Authors:  James J Tronolone; Abhishek Jain
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 18.808

8.  Human physiomimetic model integrating microphysiological systems of the gut, liver, and brain for studies of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Martin Trapecar; Emile Wogram; Devon Svoboda; Catherine Communal; Attya Omer; Tenzin Lungjangwa; Pierre Sphabmixay; Jason Velazquez; Kirsten Schneider; Charles W Wright; Samuel Mildrum; Austin Hendricks; Stuart Levine; Julien Muffat; Meelim Jasmine Lee; Douglas A Lauffenburger; David Trumper; Rudolf Jaenisch; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 9.  Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models.

Authors:  Tiffany Cameron; Tanya Bennet; Elyn M Rowe; Mehwish Anwer; Cheryl L Wellington; Karen C Cheung
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 10.  Site-specific metastasis: A cooperation between cancer cells and the metastatic microenvironment.

Authors:  Sivan Izraely; Isaac P Witz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.