Literature DB >> 30471958

Evaluating new rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens or vaccines.

Arnaud Tarantola1, Mathurin Cyrille Tejiokem2, Deborah J Briggs3.   

Abstract

The development of human rabies vaccines has evolved dramatically from the first crude nerve tissue vaccine produced then administered in the presence of Louis Pasteur in 1885. New cell culture technology has enabled highly potent and well-tolerated rabies vaccines to be produced that have reduced the volume and number of doses required to save human lives after exposure. However, these highly potent vaccines are still unaffordable to many patients living at risk of exposure on a daily basis. The cost of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is not only related to the direct cost of rabies biologicals and equipment but is also associated with indirect costs that patients incur as a result of travel, loss of work time (income loss), and accommodation over the period of time that a PEP regimen requires to be completed. This paper summarizes the particular criteria that the SAGE Working Group and WHO personnel reviewed as part of the evaluation process for recommending the new one-week intradermal vaccination regimen (2-2-2-0-0) for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis. These criteria included: Cost-effectiveness; evaluation of number of doses; seroconversion after vaccination; efficacy; safety; and patient follow-up.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IPC PEP regimen; Post-exposure prophylaxis; Rabies vaccines; Vaccine evaluation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30471958     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  6 in total

1.  A cocktail of human monoclonal antibodies broadly neutralizes North American rabies virus variants as a promising candidate for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Monir Ejemel; Todd G Smith; Lauren Greenberg; William C Carson; David Lowe; Yong Yang; Felix R Jackson; Clint N Morgan; Brock E Martin; Chantal Kling; Christina L Hutson; Nadia Gallardo-Romero; James A Ellison; Susan Moore; Adam Buzby; John Sullivan-Bolyai; Mark Klempner; Yang Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Reply to 'Alternative abridged preventive regimens against rabies for children in high endemic countries'.

Authors:  Caroline Trotter; Bernadette Abela-Ridder; Omesh Bharti; Lea Knopf; Monique Léchenne; Rolande Mindekem; Jakob Zinsstag; Katie Hampson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Spatial Inequality Hides the Burden of Dog Bites and the Risk of Dog-Mediated Human Rabies.

Authors:  Micaela De la Puente-León; Michael Z Levy; Amparo M Toledo; Sergio Recuenco; Julianna Shinnick; Ricardo Castillo-Neyra
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  A shorter post-exposure prophylaxis regimen for rabies, Pakistan.

Authors:  Naseem Salahuddin; Nadia Ansari; Muhammad Aftab Gohar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination with a high-density microarray patch: Results from a randomized, controlled phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Angus H Forster; Katey Witham; Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Margaret Veitch; James W Wells; Adam Wheatley; Melinda Pryor; Jason D Lickliter; Barbara Francis; Steve Rockman; Jesse Bodle; Peter Treasure; Julian Hickling; Germain J P Fernando
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  [New aspects of rabies control].

Authors:  H Bourhy; G D de Melo; A Tarantola
Journal:  Bull Acad Natl Med       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 0.144

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.