Literature DB >> 30471607

A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies - With an application to wetland prioritization.

Mourad Choulak1, Damien Marage2, Manon Gisbert3, Mélanie Paris3, Yves Meinard4.   

Abstract

Environmental policies are implemented in complex socio-economic settings, where numerous stakeholders hold different and potentially conflicting values. In addition to being scientifically well-founded, the experts' recommendations on which these policies are based therefore also need to be operational and legitimate. Multi-criteria decision-analysis (MCDA) is often used to solve management problems, but studies in the literature rarely place importance on the way stakeholders perceive researchers' interventions (which implies a lack of legitimacy), and most managers lack the skills to reproduce routinely the operations involved (which implies a lack of operationality). We use MCDA methodology in a different approach: "meta-decision-analysis" (Meta-DA). As researchers, instead of striving to identify the best way for us to solve managers' problems, we identify the actors (the decision-aid providers, DAPs) who are best placed to help managers, and we provide DAPs with the necessary tools. Implementing this approach involves three tasks: T1-identifying a legitimate DAP who will provide decision-aid to managers in routine policy implementations; T2- identifying, among the decisions involved in solving managers' problems, those for which managers and the stakeholders concerned consider that some actors have particular legitimacy; T3-designing tools that are compatible with both the DAP's skills and legitimacy constraints. We applied this approach, structured around T1-3, to wetland prioritization in a French administrative region (Bourgogne-Franche-Comté). This application illustrates the feasibility and usefulness of our approach. Our approach entails recommendations for various kinds of actors involved in environmental policies: For researchers, it provides a research agenda to develop new applications of MCDA. For managers and potential DAPs, it suggests that, for some of the problems they face collectively, they should seek the help of researchers to implement a Meta-DA approach. For policy-makers, it suggests that, by encouraging Meta-DA, for example through dedicated funding schemes, they could improve the effectiveness of environmental policies.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental policy; Knowledge-implementation gaps; Legitimacy; Multi-criteria decision-analysis; Prioritization; Wetlands

Year:  2018        PMID: 30471607     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  What exists in academia on work stress in accounting professionals: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Margarida Rodrigues; Cidália Oliveira; Ana Borges; Mário Franco; Rui Silva
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Bibliometric review about eco-cites and urban sustainable development: trend topics.

Authors:  Margarida Rodrigues; Mário Franco
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.219

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.