Literature DB >> 30471437

A resistant cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) genotype became susceptible to cowpea severe mosaic virus (CPSMV) after exposure to salt stress.

Anna Lídia Nunes Varela1, Jose Tadeu Abreu Oliveira2, Setsuko Komatsu3, Rodolpho Glauber Guedes Silva1, Thiago Fernandes Martins1, Pedro Filho Noronha Souza4, Ana Karla Moreira Lobo1, Ilka Maria Vasconcelos1, Fabricio Eulálio Leite Carvalho1, Joaquim Albenisio Gomes Silveira1.   

Abstract

In nature, plants are simultaneously challenged by biotic and abiotic stresses. However, little is known about the effects of these combined stresses for most crops. This work aimed to evaluate the responsed of the virus-resistant cowpea genotype BRS-Marataoã to the exposure of salt stress combined with CPSMV infection. Cowpea plants were exposed to 200 mM NaCl either simultaneously (SV plant group) or 24 h prior to the CPSMV infection [S(24 h)V plant group]. Physiological, biochemical, and proteomic analyses at 2 and 6 days post salt stress (DPS) revealed that cowpea significantly reprogrammed its cellular metabolism. Indeed, plant size, photosynthetic parameters (net photosynthesis, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and internal CO2 partial pressure) and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were reduced in S(24 h)V compared to SV. Moreover, accumulation of viral particles at 6 DPS in S(24 h)V was observed indicating that the salt stress imposed prior to virus infection favors viral particle proliferation. Proteomic analysis showed differential contents of 403 and 330 proteins at 2 DPS and 6 DPS, respectively, out of 733 differentially abundant proteins between the two plant groups. The altered leaf proteins are involved in energy and metabolism, photosynthesis, stress response, and oxidative burst. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is an original study in which a virus-resistant cowpea genotype (BRS-Marataoã) was (i) exposed simultaneously to 200 mM NaCl and inoculation with CPSMV (SV plant group) or (ii) exposed to 200 mM NaCl stress 24 h prior to inoculation with CPSMV [S(24 h)V plant group]. The purpose was to shed light on how this CPSMV resistant cowpea responded to the combined stresses. Numerous key proteins and associated pathways were altered in the cowpea plants challenged with both stresses, but unexpectedly, the salt stress imposed 24 h prior to CPSMV inoculation allowed viral proliferation, turning the cowpea genotype from resistant to susceptible.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPSMV; Combined stresses; Cowpea; Salt stress; Virus susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30471437     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  5 in total

Review 1.  Influence of virus-host interactions on plant response to abiotic stress.

Authors:  Adeeb Rahman; Kumari Veena Sinha; Sudhir K Sopory; Neeti Sanan-Mishra
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 2.  Constraints and Prospects of Improving Cowpea Productivity to Ensure Food, Nutritional Security and Environmental Sustainability.

Authors:  Olawale Israel Omomowo; Olubukola Oluranti Babalola
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Editorial: Photosynthetic Efficiency Under Multiple Stress Conditions: Prospects for Increasing Crop Yields.

Authors:  Fabricio Eulálio Leite Carvalho; Maxwell Adam Ware; Milton Costa Lima Neto; Iker Aranjuelo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact.

Authors:  Yeirme Y Jaimes-Suárez; Albert S Carvajal-Rivera; Donald A Galvis-Neira; Fabricio E L Carvalho; Jairo Rojas-Molina
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Heterogeneous root zone salinity mitigates salt injury to Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in a split-root system.

Authors:  Huawen Zhang; Runfeng Wang; Hailian Wang; Bin Liu; Mengping Xu; Yan'an Guan; Yanbing Yang; Ling Qin; Erying Chen; Feifei Li; Ruidong Huang; Yufei Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.