Literature DB >> 30470645

Cryobiopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions and DNA analysis by next generation sequencing and rapid on-site evaluation.

Ken Arimura1, Etsuko Tagaya2, Hiroyuki Akagawa3, Yoji Nagashima4, Satoru Shimizu5, Yoshihide Atsumi2, Akitoshi Sato2, Masato Kanzaki6, Mitsuko Kondo2, Kiyoshi Takeyama2, Pierre P Massion7, Jun Tamaoki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Cryo with endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) to assess the volume of specimen, determine DNA sequencing analysis, and evaluate the utility of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).
METHODS: Out of 30 patients assessed for eligibility, 23 were enrolled in this prospective study. The histological diagnostic yield of Cryo was evaluated and the volume was compared to that of trans-bronchial biopsy (TBB). DNA analysis of Cryo was performed using next generation sequencing (NGS). ROSE was compared with the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy rate was 85%, 100%, 100%, 50%, 87% for Cryo and 80%, 100%, 100%, 42.9%, 82.6% for TBB, respectively. The mean volume was 0.078 cm3 for Cryo and 0.003 cm3 for TBB (p < 0.0001). All Cryo specimens provided sufficient quantity and quality of DNA for analysis by NGS. ROSE had a high sensitivity (70%), specificity (100%), PPV (100%), and diagnostic accuracy (73.9%). There were no clinically serious adverse events except mild bleeding in 4 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Cryo with EBUS-GS for PPLs is a safe and potentially useful diagnostic strategy. It has a high diagnostic yield, and provides significantly larger specimens than TBB. It also provides high quantity and quality of DNA for NGS and high concordance rate between ROSE and the final diagnosis.
Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryobiopsy; DNA-sequencing; EBUS-GS; PPLs; ROSE

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30470645     DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Investig        ISSN: 2212-5345


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic yield of virtual bronchoscope navigation combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial cryo-biopsy for peripheral pulmonary nodules: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Feng Wang; Quncheng Zhang; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

2.  Comparison of tumor cell numbers and 22C3 PD-L1 expression between cryobiopsy and transbronchial biopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography-guide sheath for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ken Arimura; Mitsuko Kondo; Yoji Nagashima; Masato Kanzaki; Fumi Kobayashi; Kiyoshi Takeyama; Jun Tamaoki; Etsuko Tagaya
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 3.  Cryobiopsy in Lung Cancer Diagnosis-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mărioara Simon; Ioan Simon; Paul Andrei Tent; Doina Adina Todea; Antonia Haranguș
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions with Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy by Guide Sheath and Radial Endobronchial Ultrasonography: A Prospective Control Study.

Authors:  Ling Jiang; Jian Xu; Chunfang Liu; Na Gao; Jing Zhao; Xue Han; Xiaolin Zhang; Xiaohui Zhao; Yuan Liu; Weixue Wang; Junjun Zhao
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Cryobiopsy vs. Forceps Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Lung Tumors, and Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohan Giri; Guichuan Huang; Anju Puri; Rongjuan Zhuang; Yishi Li; Shuliang Guo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-10

6.  Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tadashi Sakaguchi; Yoichi Nishii; Akemi Iketani; Seiya Esumi; Maki Esumi; Kazuki Furuhashi; Yuki Nakamura; Yuta Suzuki; Kentaro Ito; Kentaro Fujiwara; Koji Katsuta; Osamu Taguchi; Osamu Hataji
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Comparison of adequacy between transbronchial lung cryobiopsy samples and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration samples for next-generation sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Mari Tone; Minoru Inomata; Nobuyasu Awano; Naoyuki Kuse; Kohei Takada; Jonsu Minami; Yutaka Muto; Kazushi Fujimoto; Toshio Kumasaka; Takehiro Izumo
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm.

Authors:  Paul Zarogoulidis; Christoforos S Kosmidis; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Dimitrios Matthaios; Konstantinos Sapalidis; Dimitrios Petridis; Eleni-Isidora Perdikouri; Nikos Courcoutsakis; Dimitris Hatzibougias; Christos Arnaoutoglou; Lutz Freitag; Aristeidis Ioannidis; Haidong Huang; Christos Tolis; Chong Bai; J Francis Turner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.