Antonio Naranjo Hernández1, Petra Díaz Del Campo Fontecha2, María Pilar Aguado Acín3, Luis Arboleya Rodríguez4, Enrique Casado Burgos5, Santos Castañeda6, Jordi Fiter Aresté7, Laia Gifre8, Carmen Gómez Vaquero9, Gloria Candelas Rodríguez10, Félix Manuel Francisco Hernández11, Núria Guañabens Gay12. 1. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España. Electronic address: anarher@gobiernodecanarias.org. 2. Unidad de Investigación, Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Madrid, España. 3. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España. 4. Sección de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España. 5. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí (UAB), Sabadell, Barcelona, España. 6. Servicio de Reumatología, IIS Princesa, Madrid, España. 7. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, España. 8. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España. 9. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España. 10. Servicio de Reumatología. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España; Grupo de Revisores de Evidencia de la SER, Madrid, España. 11. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España; Grupo de Revisores de Evidencia de la SER, Madrid, España. 12. Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations on osteoporosis (OP) of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) based on the best possible evidence. METHODS: A panel of nine expert rheumatologists in OP was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call. The phases of the work were: identification of the key areas for updating the previous consensus, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the SIGN levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and consensus techniques. RESULTS: This revision of the recommendations implies an update in the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of OP. It proposes some criteria to consider the high risk of fracture and some indications to start treatment. The recommendations also address issues related to the safety of treatments and the management of special situations such as inflammatory diseases and treatment with glucocorticoids. CONCLUSIONS: We present an update of SER recommendations on OP.
OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations on osteoporosis (OP) of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) based on the best possible evidence. METHODS: A panel of nine expert rheumatologists in OP was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call. The phases of the work were: identification of the key areas for updating the previous consensus, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the SIGN levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and consensus techniques. RESULTS: This revision of the recommendations implies an update in the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of OP. It proposes some criteria to consider the high risk of fracture and some indications to start treatment. The recommendations also address issues related to the safety of treatments and the management of special situations such as inflammatory diseases and treatment with glucocorticoids. CONCLUSIONS: We present an update of SER recommendations on OP.
Keywords:
Diagnosis; Diagnóstico, Tratamiento; Fractura; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Recomendaciones; Recommendations; Sociedad Española de Reumatología; Spanish Society of Rheumatology; Treatment
Authors: Enrique Casado; Angel Borque-Fernando; Manuel Caamaño; Jenaro Graña; Jesús Muñoz-Rodríguez; Juan Morote Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 5.400