| Literature DB >> 30469411 |
Constantin Croitoru1, Claudia Mureșan2, Mihaela Turturică3, Nicoleta Stănciuc4, Doina Georgeta Andronoiu5, Loredana Dumitrașcu6, Vasilica Barbu7, Elena Enachi Ioniță8, Georgiana Horincar Parfene9, Gabriela Râpeanu10.
Abstract
Effects of partial (50%) and total replacement of wheat flour with black rice flour on the phytochemical, physico-chemical, sensorial, and textural properties of muffins were studied. Partial or total replacement of wheat flour with black rice flour in muffins improved their nutritional and antioxidative properties with a positive effect on microbiological and color stability during the storage period in accelerated conditions. The low gluten muffins had an anthocyanin content of 27.54 ± 2.22 mg cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G)/100 g dry weight (DW), whereas the gluten free muffins had 46.11 ± 3.91 mg C3G/100 g DW, with significant antioxidant values. Retention of 60% and 64% for anthocyanins and 72% and 80% for antioxidant activity after baking was found. The fracturability and hardness scores increased with the addition of black rice flour, whereas firmness and chewiness increased for gluten free muffins. The confocal analysis revealed a tendency of glucidic components to aggregate, with gathers of small bunches of black rice starch granules comprising anthocyanin. The results allowed designing two new value added bakery products, low and free gluten muffins, with significant high amounts of bioactive compounds, suggesting the functional potential of black rice flour.Entities:
Keywords: added value products; anthocyanins; antioxidant activity; black rice flour; low gluten muffins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30469411 PMCID: PMC6278335 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23113047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram of anthocyanins from black rice flour.
Phytochemical characteristics of batters.
| Phytochemical Properties | Samples | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | |
| Total anthocyanin content (TAC), mg cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G)/100 g dry weight (DW) | n.d. | 69.93 ± 2.34 a | 125.4 ± 6.64 b |
| Total polyphenolic content (TPC), mg gallic acid (GA)/100 g DW | 82.1 ± 1.06 a | 254.1 ± 5.52 b,c | 307.3 ± 1.02 b |
| Total flavonoid content (TFC), mg catechin equivalents (CE)/100 g DW | 71.2 ± 1.44 a | 149.4 ± 3.10 b | 187.1 ± 5.04 c |
| Antioxidant activity, mM 6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox)/100 g DW | 152.8 ± 2.10 a | 611.2 ± 8.32 b,c | 552.71 ± 5.06 c |
* Values with different letters in the same raw are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Physico-chemical and phytochemical characteristics of muffins.
| Physico-Chemical and Phytochemical Properties | Samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | ||
| Proteins, g/100 g | 11.69 ± 0.57 b | 12.16 ± 1.16 a | 12.71 ± 0.92 a | |
| Fats, g/100 g | 20.17 ± 1.37 b | 20.22 ± 0.45 c | 18.37 ± 1.91 a | |
| Carbohydrates, g/100 g | 45.44 ± 2.60 a | 42.91 ± 1.68 b,c | 42.38 ± 2.51 c | |
| Moisture, g/100 g | 20.60 ± 0.11 b | 22.53 ± 0.23 c | 24.13 ± 0.15 d | |
| Ash, g/100 g | 2.10 ± 0.01 a | 2.18 ± 0.01 a | 2.41 ± 0.01 b | |
| Energy value, %: | | | | |
| TAC, mg C3G/100 g DW | n.d. | 27.54 ± 2.22 a | 46.11 ± 3.91 b | |
| TPC, mg GA/100 g DW | 64.4 ± 3.16 a | 170.3 ± 4.55 b | 226.5 ± 2.14 v | |
| TFC, mg CE/100 g DW | 57.2 ± 0.94 a | 133.4 ± 1.88 b | 158.6 ± 1.02 c | |
| Antioxidant activity, mM Trolox/100 g DW | 124.6 ± 3.20 a | 445.89 ± 2.22 b,c | 552.71 ± 5.06 c | |
| Colorimetric parameters | 80.41 ± 9.13 a | 27.71 ± 0.15 b | 19.6 ± 3.58 b,c | |
| 0.06 ± 0.001 a | 8.47 ± 1.08 b | 6.53 ± 0.95 c | ||
| 51.83 ± 1.15 a | 7.31 ± 0.41 b | 1.49 ± 0.14 c | ||
* Values with different letters in the same raw are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Sensory characteristics of muffins.
| Sensorial Attribute | Samples | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | |
| Color | 1.82 ± 0.87 a | 5.63 ± 1.2 | 6.27 ± 1.27 |
| Surface humidity | 3.27 ± 1.84 a | 3.82 ± 0.98 a | 4.72 ± 1.19 |
| Cross section appereance | 1.73 ± 1.10 | 1.64 ± 0.92 | 2.55 ± 1.7 |
| Denseness | 2.82 ± 1.47 | 2.82 ± 1.25 | 2.82 ± 1.94 |
| Fracturability | 2.46 ± 1.7 | 2.82 ± 1.33 | 3.64 ± 1.7 |
| Hardness | 2.64 ± 1.57 a | 3.73 ± 1.35 a | 4.36 ± 1.5 |
| Cohesivity | 5.46 ± 1.21 | 4.73 ± 1.00 | 4.55 ± 1.44 |
| Moistness of mass | 3.36 ± 1.75 | 3.46 ± 1.58 | 3.81 ± 2.27 |
| Taste | 6.00 ± 0.89 | 5.09 ± 1.22 | 4.90 ± 1.38 |
| Sweetness | 4.90 ± 1.51 | 4.27 ± 1.67 | 4.63 ± 1.7 |
| Overall acceptability | 5.90 ± 0.83 | 5.18 ± 0.98 | 5.18 ± 1.4 |
a Based on Dunnett multiple comparisons with a control, means on the same row that do not share a letter are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Texture parameters of muffins.
| Textural Parameters, Unit | Samples | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | |
| Firmness, N | 4.75 ± 0.16 a | 5.82 ± 0.26 | 6.67 ± 0.02 |
| Cohesiveness, dimensionless | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 |
| Springiness, mm | 6.95 ± 0.06 | 6.83 ± 0.08 | 6.57 ± 0.23 |
| Chewiness, mJ | 10.15 ± 0.23 | 12.21 ± 0.25 | 15.13 ± 0.17 |
a Mean of the five determinations ± standard deviation.
Figure 2Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of control 1—wheat flour (a), and control 2—black rice flour (b1 and b2).
Figure 3Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of muffin samples: (S1) (muffins with wheat flour), (S2) (muffins with 1:1 wheat and black rice flour) and (S3) (muffins with black rice flour).
Figure 4The patterns of gastric (a) and duodenal (b) digestion of formulated muffins S2 (muffins with 1:1 wheat and black rice flour) and S3 (muffins with black rice flour).
Figure 5The retention in anthocyanis content (a), total polyphenols (b), total flavonoids (c) and antioxidant activity (d) of muffins during storage at a temperature of 25 °C for 21 days.
Colorimetric analysis of muffins.
| Storage Period, Days | S1 | S2 | S3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorimetric Parameters | |||||||||
| L * | a * | b * | L * | a * | b * | L * | a * | b * | |
|
| 80.41 ± 9.13 c,d | 0.06 ± 0.001 b,c | 51.83 ± 1.15 a,b | 27.71 ± 0.15 b,c,d | 8.47 ± 1.08 a,b,c,d | 7.31 ± 0.41 a,b,c | 19.6 ± 3.58 c | 6.53 ± 0.95 a b | 1.49 ± 0.14 a,b,c |
|
| 88.02 ± 0.83 a | 0.10 ± 0.001 b | 60.11 ± 4.96 b,c | 29.42 ± 0.30 d | 9.10 ± 1.63 a,b | 8.40 ± 0.83 a | 23.9 ± 1.96 b,c | 7.30 ± 1.30 a,b,d | 1.71 ± 0.26 a,b,c |
|
| 110.41 ± 5.25 a,b,c,d | 0.18 ± 0.011 b | 73.25 ± 2.49 d | 35.80 ± 73.74 a,b | 10.30 ± 1.84 a | 9.20 ± 0.94 c | 28.8 ± 2.49 d | 11.6 ± 0.22 c | 2.25 ± 0.66 a |
|
| 119.63 ±4.60 b,c,d | 0.21 ± 0.057 b | 75.53 ± 4.31 a,b | 38.51 ± 1.41 a,b,c | 11.11 ± 1.10 a,b,c,d | 9.62 ± 0.31 b,c | 30.1 ± 3.63 a,b | 13.2 ± 0.95 a,b | 3.51 ± 0.51 b,c,d |
Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) (L *—lightness, a *—redness, b *—yellowness).
Yeasts and molds during storage (colony forming unit CFU/g).
| Samples | Storage Period, Days | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
|
| <10 | 1.33∙× 102 ± 0.13 | 2.59 × 103 ± 0.08 | 5.16 × 105 ± 1.10 |
|
| <10 | <10 | <100 | <100 |
|
| <10 | <10 | <10 | <100 |