Literature DB >> 30469126

Assessing the exposure-response relationship of sleep disturbance and vibration in field and laboratory settings.

Kerstin Persson Waye1, Michael G Smith2, Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb2, Arnold Koopman3, Mikael Ögren2, Eulalia Peris4, David Waddington4, James Woodcock4, Calum Sharp5, Sabine Janssen6.   

Abstract

Exposure to nocturnal freight train vibrations may impact sleep, but exposure-response relationships are lacking. The European project CargoVibes evaluated sleep disturbance both in the field and in the laboratory and provides unique data, as measures of response and exposure metrics are comparable. This paper therefore provides data on exposure-response relationships of vibration and sleep disturbance and compares the relationships evaluated in the laboratory and the field. Two field studies (one in Poland and one in the Netherlands) with 233 valid respondents in total, and three laboratory studies in Sweden with a total of 59 subjects over 350 person-nights were performed. The odds ratios (OR) of sleep disturbance were analyzed in relation to nighttime vibration exposure by ordinal logit regression, adjusting for moderating factors common for the studies. Outcome specific fractions were calculated for eleven sleep outcomes and supported comparability between the field and laboratory settings. Vibration exposure was significantly associated with sleep disturbance, OR = 3.51 (95% confidence interval 2.6-4.73) denoting a three and a half times increase in the odds of sleep disturbance with one unit increased 8 h nighttime log10 Root Mean Square vibration. The results suggest no significant difference between field and laboratory settings OR = 1.37 (0.59-3.19). However, odds of sleep disturbance were higher in the Netherlands as compared to Sweden, indicating unexplained differences between study populations or countries, possibly related to cultural and contextual differences and uncertainties in exposure assessments. Future studies should be carefully designed to record explanatory factors in the field and enhance ecological validity in the laboratory. Nevertheless, the presented combined data set provides a first set of exposure response relationships for vibration-induced sleep disturbance, which are useful when considering public health outcomes among exposed populations.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure-response; Field; Freight train; Laboratory; Sleep; Vibration

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30469126     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  4 in total

Review 1.  Environmental Noise and Effects on Sleep: An Update to the WHO Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael G Smith; Makayla Cordoza; Mathias Basner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.035

2.  Evaluating the Impact of Metro Interior Noise on Passenger Annoyance: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Meng Ma; Wenqian Ran; Jinping Wu; Minghang Li; Xiangyu Qu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  A laboratory study on the effects of wind turbine noise on sleep: results of the polysomnographic WiTNES study.

Authors:  Michael G Smith; Mikael Ögren; Pontus Thorsson; Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb; Eja Pedersen; Jens Forssén; Julia Ageborg Morsing; Kerstin Persson Waye
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Wind Turbine Noise and Sleep: Pilot Studies on the Influence of Noise Characteristics.

Authors:  Julia Ageborg Morsing; Michael G Smith; Mikael Ögren; Pontus Thorsson; Eja Pedersen; Jens Forssén; Kerstin Persson Waye
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.