Literature DB >> 30468766

Characterization and correlation of signal drift in diffusion weighted MRI.

Colin B Hansen1, Vishwesh Nath2, Allison E Hainline3, Kurt G Schilling4, Prasanna Parvathaneni5, Roza G Bayrak2, Justin A Blaber5, Okan Irfanoglu6, Carlo Pierpaoli6, Adam W Anderson7, Baxter P Rogers7, Bennett A Landman8.   

Abstract

Diffusion weighted MRI (DWMRI) and the myriad of analysis approaches (from tensors to spherical harmonics and brain tractography to body multi-compartment models) depend on accurate quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Signal drift during imaging (e.g., due to b0 drift associated with heating) can cause systematic non-linearities that manifest as ADC changes if not corrected. Herein, we present a case study on two phantoms on one scanner. Different scan protocols exhibit different degrees of drift during similar scans and may be sensitive to the order of scans within an exam. Vos et al. recently reviewed the effects of signal drift in DWMRI acquisitions and proposed a temporal model for correction. We propose a novel spatial-temporal model to correct for higher order aspects of the signal drift and derive a statistically robust variant. We evaluate the Vos model and propose a method using two phantoms that mimic the ADC of the relevant brain tissue (0.36-2.2 × 10-3 mm2/s) on a single 3 T scanner. The phantoms are (1) a spherical isotropic sphere consisting of a single concentration of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and (2) an ice-water phantom with 13 vials of varying PVP concentrations. To characterize the impact of interspersed minimally weighted volumes ("b0's"), image volumes with b-value equal to 0.1 s/mm2 are interspersed every 8, 16, 32, 48, and 96 diffusion weighted volumes in different trials. Signal drift is found to have spatially varying effects that are not accounted for with temporal-only models. The novel model captures drift more accurately (i.e., reduces the overall change per-voxel over the course of a scan) and results in more consistent ADC metrics.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion; Drift; Interspersed; Phantom; Signal; Spatial; Temporal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30468766      PMCID: PMC7074846          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  21 in total

1.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Jesper L R Andersson; Stefan Skare; John Ashburner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Wavelet-based estimation of a semiparametric generalized linear model of fMRI time-series.

Authors:  François G Meyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Real-time RF pulse adjustment for B0 drift correction.

Authors:  Thomas Benner; André J W van der Kouwe; John E Kirsch; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections.

Authors:  Marco Catani; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Fortin; Drew Parker; Birkan Tunç; Takanori Watanabe; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; David R Roalf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Robert T Schultz; Ragini Verma; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Inter-site and inter-scanner diffusion MRI data harmonization.

Authors:  H Mirzaalian; L Ning; P Savadjiev; O Pasternak; S Bouix; O Michailovich; G Grant; C E Marx; R A Morey; L A Flashman; M S George; T W McAllister; N Andaluz; L Shutter; R Coimbra; R D Zafonte; M J Coleman; M Kubicki; C F Westin; M B Stein; M E Shenton; Y Rathi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The importance of correcting for signal drift in diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Sjoerd B Vos; Chantal M W Tax; Peter R Luijten; Sebastien Ourselin; Alexander Leemans; Martijn Froeling
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.

Authors:  Matthew Grech-Sollars; Patrick W Hales; Keiko Miyazaki; Felix Raschke; Daniel Rodriguez; Martin Wilson; Simrandip K Gill; Tina Banks; Dawn E Saunders; Jonathan D Clayden; Matt N Gwilliam; Thomas R Barrick; Paul S Morgan; Nigel P Davies; James Rossiter; Dorothee P Auer; Richard Grundy; Martin O Leach; Franklyn A Howe; Andrew C Peet; Chris A Clark
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Improved sensitivity to cerebral white matter abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease with spherical deconvolution based tractography.

Authors:  Yael D Reijmer; Alexander Leemans; Sophie M Heringa; Ilse Wielaard; Ben Jeurissen; Huiberdina L Koek; Geert Jan Biessels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tractography of the parahippocampal gyrus and material specific memory impairment in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  M Yogarajah; H W R Powell; G J M Parker; D C Alexander; P J Thompson; M R Symms; P Boulby; C A Wheeler-Kingshott; G J Barker; M J Koepp; J S Duncan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Tractography methods and findings in brain tumors and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Fang-Cheng Yeh; Andrei Irimia; Dhiego Chaves de Almeida Bastos; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  What's new and what's next in diffusion MRI preprocessing.

Authors:  Chantal M W Tax; Matteo Bastiani; Jelle Veraart; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; M Okan Irfanoglu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 7.400

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.