Literature DB >> 30467848

Risk-based approach versus culture-based screening for identification of group B streptococci among women in labor.

Mohammed R Khalil1, Niels Uldbjerg2, Poul B Thorsen3, Jens K Møller4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a risk-based and culture-based screening approach for identification of group B streptococci (GBS) vaginal colonization using an intrapartum rectovaginal culture as the reference standard.
METHODS: Pregnant women attending the prenatal clinic at Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark, between April 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, were invited to participate in a prospective observational study. For prepartum culture-based screening, vaginal and rectal culture samples were obtained and, for reference, standard, paired vaginal and rectal culture samples were collected during labor. Risk factors for risk-based screening were previous early-onset GBS, GBS bacteriuria during pregnancy, maternal temperature ≥38.0°C intrapartum, and rupture of membranes for more than 18 hours.
RESULTS: The intrapartum rectovaginal GBS colonization rate was 30% (32/108) among participants with risk factors and 15% (123/794) among participants without risk factors. Culture-based screening demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio in predicting intrapartum GBS carriage of 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84), 95% (94-97), 78% (70-84), 95% (94-97), and 17 (12-23), respectively; for risk-based screening, these values were 21% (15-28), 90% (87-92), 30% (22-38), 85% (83-86), and 2 (1-3), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Culture-based screening performed considerably better than a risk-based approach in identifying intrapartum GBS colonization.
© 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic prophylaxis; Culture-screening strategy; Early-onset neonatal infection; Group B streptococci; Intrapartum colonization; Risk-based approach

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467848     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

Review 1.  Group B Streptococcus Screening Guidelines in Pregnancy: A Critical Review of Compliance.

Authors:  Sabine Pangerl; Deborah Sundin; Sadie Geraghty
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  Clinical Profile and Outcome of Group B Streptococcal Colonization in Mothers and Neonates in Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Shatha Taher Salman AlZuheiri; Rajani Dube; Godfred Menezes; Samar Qasem
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-04

3.  Group B streptococcal infections in infants in Iceland: clinical and microbiological factors.

Authors:  Birta Baeringsdottir; Helga Erlendsdottir; Erla Soffia Bjornsdottir; Elisabete R Martins; Mário Ramirez; Asgeir Haraldsson; Thordur Thorkelsson
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Invasive group B Streptococcus strains and clinical characteristics in Danish infants from 1999 to 2009.

Authors:  Mads Andersen; Birgitte Smith; May Murra; Stine Yde Nielsen; Hans-Christian Slotved; Tine Brink Henriksen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.