Literature DB >> 30467717

DDR Inc., one business, two associates.

María Moriel-Carretero1, Philippe Pasero1, Benjamin Pardo2.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells activate cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA damage. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA damage response is achieved by the activation of the sensor kinases Mec1 and Tel1 and transmitted to the effector kinase Rad53. Rad9 and Mrc1 are thought to differentially mediate the activation of Rad53 depending on the cell cycle phase. Rad9 can respond to DNA lesions throughout the cell cycle, whereas Mrc1 responds to replication impediments in S phase. It was not clear if Rad9 and Mrc1 were triggering the same response to DNA damage occurring in S phase. By carefully studying the kinetics of activation of Rad53 by different types of replication stresses, we recently showed that Rad9 and Mrc1 cooperate in time and space to trigger a unique response to DNA damage in S phase. This primarily includes the control of both DNA replication initiation and elongation. After showing that Rad9 plays a preponderant role during S phase, the data presented here provocatively suggest that Mrc1 could also mediate the activation of Rad53 outside of S phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication; Mediators; Mrc1; Rad9; Replication stress; S-phase checkpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467717     DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0908-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genet        ISSN: 0172-8083            Impact factor:   3.886


  10 in total

1.  Tel1/ATM Signaling to the Checkpoint Contributes to Replicative Senescence in the Absence of Telomerase.

Authors:  Luca Menin; Chiara Vittoria Colombo; Giorgia Maestrini; Maria Pia Longhese; Michela Clerici
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  ATM and ATR Influence Meiotic Crossover Formation Through Antagonistic and Overlapping Functions in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Wei Li; Judith L Yanowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  A role for the yeast PCNA unloader Elg1 in eliciting the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Soumitra Sau; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  The Fork Protection Complex: A Regulatory Hub at the Head of the Replisome.

Authors:  Daniel B Grabarczyk
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Help or hindrance: how do microtubule-based forces contribute to genome damage and repair?

Authors:  Cassi Estrem; Jeffrey K Moore
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Regulation of the abundance of Y-family polymerases in the cell cycle of budding yeast in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sobolewska; Agnieszka Halas; Michal Plachta; Justyna McIntyre; Ewa Sledziewska-Gojska
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 7.  The Amazing Acrobat: Yeast's Histone H3K56 Juggles Several Important Roles While Maintaining Perfect Balance.

Authors:  Lihi Gershon; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Access to PCNA by Srs2 and Elg1 Controls the Choice between Alternative Repair Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Matan Arbel; Alex Bronstein; Soumitra Sau; Batia Liefshitz; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 9.  The CWI Pathway: A Versatile Toolbox to Arrest Cell-Cycle Progression.

Authors:  Inma Quilis; Mercè Gomar-Alba; Juan Carlos Igual
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04

Review 10.  Coupling DNA Replication and Spindle Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dimitris Liakopoulos
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.