| Literature DB >> 30467343 |
Sudarshan R Jadcherla1, Nour Hanandeh2, Kathryn A Hasenstab2, Saira Nawaz2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In adults, distal baseline impedance (BI) is a determinant of esophageal mucosal integrity with values <900 Ω indicating inflammation. Relationships between acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and BI in neonates are unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30467343 PMCID: PMC6377827 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-018-0237-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Res ISSN: 0031-3998 Impact factor: 3.756
Clinical characteristics and aerodigestive outcomes stratified by baseline impedance
| Characteristics | BI<900 (N = 11) | BI 900-2000 (N =125) | BI>2000 (N = 62) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age, wks | 32.6 ± 5.2 | 31.1 ± 4.4 | 28.7 ± 4.3 | <0.01 |
| Cardiorespiratory symptoms, % | 45 | 46 | 27 | 0.10 |
| Feeding difficulty, % | 45 | 41 | 37 | 0.87 |
| Reflux type of symptoms, % | 18 | 30 | 44 | 0.09 |
| Postmenstrual age, wks | 41.4 ± 3.6 | 42.1 ± 4.4 | 45.0 ± 6.1 | <0.01 |
| Chronological age, wks | 8.8 ± 3.7 | 11.0 ± 5.8 | 16.3 ± 7.3 | 0.02 |
| Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, % | 27 | 40 | 71 | <0.01 |
| Breathing support (ventilator: NCPAP: NC: none), % | 0: 9: 18: 73 | 0: 3: 35: 62 | 10: 7: 44: 39 | <0.01 |
| Feeding method (tube: oral), % | 36: 64 | 27: 73 | 44: 56 | 0.17 |
| Milk type (F: F and B: B) % | 0: 55: 45 | 5: 56: 39 | 2: 64: 34 | 0.62 |
| Caloric density, cal/oz | 24.6 ± 2.9 | 23.8 ± 2.9 | 25.5 ± 2.7 | 0.69 |
| Total fluid volume, ml/kg/day | 141 ± 19 | 144 ± 20 | 135 ± 18 | 0.81 |
| Frequency of feeds, #/day | 8.3 ± 0.8 | 8.0 ± 1.4 | 8.1 ± 1.5 | 0.07 |
| Length of hospital stay, days | 47 ± 35 | 66 ± 60 | 115 ± 101 | <0.01 |
| Breathing support (tracheostomy: NC: none), % | 0: 9: 91 | 2: 23: 75 | 7: 52: 41 | <0.01 |
| Feeding method (tube: oral) % | 27: 73[ | 9: 91 | 19: 81 | 0.11 |
| Proton pump inhibiter usage, % | 82 | 66 | 40 | <0.01 |
Values presented as mean ± SD or %.
P<0.05 vs. BI 900-2000 (Moderate Inflammation),
P<0.05 vs. BI >2000 (No Inflammation).
NCPAP- nasal continuous positive airway pressure, NC-nasal cannula oxygen, F-formula, B-breastmilk.
Figure 1:Twenty-four hour pH-Impedance tracing (top panel) and 1-min baseline impedance segment (lower panel).
Ten 1-minute windows (yellow bars) at rest (during non-mealtimes, and absence of anterograde or retrograde activity) were randomly selected for calculation of distal baseline impedance (BI). The Z6 (in distal esophagus) channel is close to the site of most acid exposure; hence, BI was calculated at this site.
Figure 2:Effect of esophageal inflammation on esophageal acid exposure.
*P<0.05 vs BI >2000 Ω, †P<0.05 vs BI 900-2000 Ω. Box plots represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent 10th and 90th percentile; median is represented by the black horizontal line and mean by the black dashed line. Acid reflux index (ARI) values are distinct between baseline impedance categories. Note the BI < 900 Ω (severe inflammation) category has increased ARI, whereas > 2000 Ω (minimal inflammation) category has decreased ARI.
Comparison of pH-impedance characteristics by severity of esophageal inflammation classified by distal baseline impedance (BI)
| Characteristics | BI < 900 (N = 11) | BI 900 – 2000 (N = 125) | BI >2000 (N = 62) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acid reflux index, % | 21.3 ± 15.3 | 8.6 ± 7.3 | 4.4 ± 4.6 | <0.01 |
| Acid reflux events, #/day | 153.6 ± 9.7 | 82.4 ± 5.1 | 45.6 ± 4.1 | <0.01 |
| Acid reflux events > 5 min, n | 11.9 ± 2.6 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | <0.01 |
| Longest acid reflux, min | 29.1 ± 4.3 | 17.7 ± 1.4 | 12.3 ± 2.4 | 0.17 |
| Acid ascending events, #/day | 40.6 ± 9.2 | 20.9 ± 1.6 | 13.7 ± 1.5 | <0.01 |
| Weakly acid ascending events, #/day | 56.1 ± 13.9[ | 50.1 ± 2.8 | 37.1 ± 3.7 | 0.10 |
| Total ascending reflux events, #/day | 113.6 ± 11.5 | 75.4 ± 3.9 | 62.7 ± 5.1 | 0.52 |
| Bolus clearance time, sec | 1369 ± 565 | 1083 ± 504 | 1075 ± 343 | <0.01 |
| 4.3 ± 0.6 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 0.20 | |
| Cardiorespiratory, #/hour | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 1.6 | <0.01 |
| Sensory, #/hour | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ± 1.9 | <0.01 |
| Physical, #/hour | 2.3 ± 1.7 | 3.3 ± 1.8 | 3.2 ± 1.9 | 0.9 |
| Ascending bolus reflux, % | 73 | 55 | 56 | 0.53 |
| Cardiorespiratory symptoms, % | 45 | 34 | 37 | 0.69 |
| Sensory symptoms, % | 45 | 22 | 26 | 0.20 |
| Physical symptoms, % | 36 | 31 | 19 | 0.19 |
| Acid reflux, % | 55 | 39 | 34 | 0.41 |
| Cardiorespiratory symptoms, % | 45 | 23 | 24 | 0.26 |
| Sensory symptoms, % | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0.71 |
| Physical symptoms,% | 18 | 20 | 13 | 0.49 |
Values presented as mean ± SD or %.
P<0.05 vs. BI 900-2000 (Moderate Inflammation),
P<0.05 vs. BI >2000 (No Inflammation).
SAP- symptom association probability. Ascending events are those reaching at least Z5 impedance channel.
Contributing Factors to Esophageal BI
| Characteristics | Coefficient ± SE | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age, days | 55 ± 48 | 0.26 |
| Tube feeding | − 44 ± 90 | 0.62 |
| Acid reflux events, #/day | − 3 ± 2 | 0.12 |
| Bolus clearance time, sec | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.22 |
Values presented as linear regression coefficients ± SE.