Literature DB >> 30467217

Retrospective Review of Otic Capsule Contour and Thickness in Patients with Otosclerosis and Individuals with Normal Hearing on CT.

N Sanghan1, T Chansakul1, E D Kozin1, A F Juliano1, H D Curtin1, K L Reinshagen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Otosclerosis is commonly identified on CT as a focus of hypodensity in the otic capsule anterior to the oval window. However, otosclerosis can have a sclerotic phase approximating the density of normal bone, making diagnosis challenging. This study assesses differences in otic capsule contour and thickness anterolateral to the anterior margin of the oval window in patients with otosclerosis compared with individuals with normal hearing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Axial CT of 104 ears with clinically diagnosed otosclerosis and 108 consecutive ears of audiometrically normal individuals were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists independently evaluated the pattern of otosclerosis, otic capsule contour, and bone thickness on standardized axial images at the level of the oval window and cochleariform process. Measurements were made from the posterolateral margin of the cochlea to the apex of the otic capsule convex contour just anterolateral to the anterior margin of the oval window. In the absence of a convex contour, the sulcus between the oval window and the cochleariform process was identified, and measurement to the depth of the sulcus was used. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the best cutoff value of otic capsule thickness.
RESULTS: Mean otic capsule thickness (2 SDs) was 3.08 (0.93) mm and 1.82 (0.31) mm in patients with otosclerosis and individuals with normal hearing, respectively (P < .001), with excellent interobserver agreement. Otic capsule thickness of >2.3 mm had 96.2% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 96.4% negative predictive value for otosclerosis. A bulging/convex contour of the otic capsule had 68.3% sensitivity, 98.1% specificity, 97.3% positive predictive value, and 76.3% negative predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with otosclerosis have significantly thicker bone abutting the oval window than individuals with normal hearing.
© 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467217      PMCID: PMC6295232          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  16 in total

1.  Otosclerosis. A genetic and clinical study.

Authors:  A LARSSON
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1960

2.  Histologic variants in otosclerosis.

Authors:  H F Schuknecht; W Barber
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Round window otosclerosis: radiologic classification and clinical correlations.

Authors:  Salah Mansour; Karen Nicolas; Hassan Haidar Ahmad
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Comparative analysis of preoperative diagnostic values of HRCT and CBCT in patients with histologically diagnosed otosclerotic stapes footplates.

Authors:  Péter Révész; Balázs Liktor; Bálint Liktor; István Sziklai; Imre Gerlinger; Tamás Karosi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Diagnostic value of cone-beam CT in histologically confirmed otosclerosis.

Authors:  Balázs Liktor; Péter Révész; Péter Csomor; Imre Gerlinger; István Sziklai; Tamás Karosi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Imaging Review of the Temporal Bone: Part II. Traumatic, Postoperative, and Noninflammatory Nonneoplastic Conditions.

Authors:  Amy F Juliano; Daniel T Ginat; Gul Moonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Localized pericochlear hypoattenuating foci at temporal-bone thin-section CT in pediatric patients: nonpathologic differential diagnostic entity?

Authors:  Johanna Pekkola; Anne Pitkaranta; Alexandra Jappel; Christian Czerny; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Markku Heliovaara; Soraya Robinson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Fenestral and cochlear otosclerosis: computed tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  J D Swartz; D W Mandell; R J Wolfson; F I Marlowe; G L Popky; H D Silberman; H Wilf; N G Swartz; A S Berger
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1985-11

9.  Diagnostic performance of high resolution computed tomography in otosclerosis.

Authors:  Todd Kanzara; Jagdeep Singh Virk
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

10.  Imaging in otosclerosis: A pictorial review.

Authors:  Bela Purohit; Robert Hermans; Katya Op de Beeck
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-02-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Computed Tomography Density as a Bio-marker for Histologic Grade of Otosclerosis: A Human Temporal Bone Pathology Study.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Reuven Ishai; Timothy Meehan; Jennifer T O'Malley; Renee Mitchell; Jennifer J Shin; Hugh D Curtin; Joseph B Nadol; Michael J McKenna; Amy F Juliano
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Imaging Studies in Otosclerosis: An Up-to-date Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Lucas Resende Lucinda Mangia; Luiz Otávio de Mattos Coelho; Bettina Carvalho; Adriana Kosma Pires de Oliveira; Rogerio Hamerschmidt
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-24

3.  Diagnostic Performance of Conebeam CT Pixel Values in Active Fenestral Otosclerosis.

Authors:  F Deng; P Touska; K L Reinshagen; H D Curtin; A F Juliano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.966

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.