Literature DB >> 30467027

Accuracy of 3D surface scanners for clinical torso and spinal deformity assessment.

Caroline A Grant1, Melissa Johnston2, Clayton J Adam1, J Paige Little3.   

Abstract

Externally visible deformities are cosmetic features of great concern for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients. Current assessment techniques for AIS do not fully encompass the external deformity. A non-invasive method capable of capturing superficial anatomy, such as 3D scanning, would enable better qualitative and quantitative evaluation of cosmesis. This study aimed to quantify the accuracy of commonly available scanners, in assessing posterior asymmetry in AIS. The technique of 3D surface deviation analysis was proposed as a suitable method for comparing the models created by each scanner. Eight plaster cast moulds manufactured to create braces for AIS patients were used as test samples. Four 3D scanners were selected: Solutionix RexScan CS+; Artec Eva; Microsoft Kinect V1; iPhone with 123D Catch App. These scanners were selected from those available as representative of a range of scanning technologies. Each cast was scanned and 3D models created. A simulated rib hump measurement was obtained and the surface-to-surface deviations between the Solutionix scan and all other scans were determined. The Solutionix scanner is a metrology scanner of very high quality and so it was selected as the reference. Surface-to-surface deviations were calculated in the positive and negative directions separately to specifically identify size and volume inaccuracies created by the scans. Surface deviations showed excellent agreement between the Solutionix and the Eva with deviations of +0.17 ± 0.17 mm (Eva regions larger) and -0.20 ± 0.32 mm (Eva regions smaller) (mean±SD). The Kinect showed lower agreement (+1.58 ± 1.50 mm and -0.58 ± 0.58 mm). The iPhone scans were not able to be scaled to the correct size, so were excluded. Rib hump measurements with all scanners were within clinical measurement variability (±4.9 deg) of the known values. These commercially available 3D scanners are capable of imaging torso shape in 3D and deriving clinically relevant external deformity measures. The non-invasive 3D topographic information provided can be used to improve assessment of torso shape in spinal deformity patients.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D Scanning; Accuracy; Reproducibility of results; Scoliosis; Surface Deviations; Surface topography; Torso Deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467027     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  10 in total

1.  [Visual sensitivity threshold of lateral view of nasolabial Angle changes in edentulous jaw patients].

Authors:  L You; K H Deng; W W Li; Y J Zhao; Y C Sun; Y S Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

2.  Prediction of brace effect in scoliotic patients: blinded evaluation of a novel brace simulator-an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Matthieu Nesme; Julien Gerbelot; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; François Faure
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The development of a low-cost photogrammetry-based 3D hand scanner.

Authors:  Yusheng Yang; Jun Xu; Willemijn S Elkhuizen; Yu Song
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2021-06-21

4.  Predicting spinal profile using 3D non-contact surface scanning: Changes in surface topography as a predictor of internal spinal alignment.

Authors:  J Paige Little; Lionel Rayward; Mark J Pearcy; Maree T Izatt; Daniel Green; Robert D Labrom; Geoffrey N Askin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Three-dimensional surface scanning methods in osteology: A topographical and geometric morphometric comparison.

Authors:  Lukas Waltenberger; Katharina Rebay-Salisbury; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  The Use of Smartphone Photogrammetry to Digitise Transtibial Sockets: Optimisation of Method and Quantitative Evaluation of Suitability.

Authors:  Sean Cullen; Ruth Mackay; Amir Mohagheghi; Xinli Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Validation of a novel Kinect-based device for 3D scanning of the foot plantar surface in weight-bearing.

Authors:  Giulia Rogati; Alberto Leardini; Maurizio Ortolani; Paolo Caravaggi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Decreased Vertical Trunk Inclination Angle and Pelvic Inclination as the Result of Mid-High-Heeled Footwear on Static Posture Parameters in Asymptomatic Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jakub Michoński; Marcin Witkowski; Bożena Glinkowska; Robert Sitnik; Wojciech Glinkowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Optical imaging versus CT and plain radiography to quantify pectus severity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean H T Daemen; Tom G J Loonen; Pieter W J Lozekoot; Jos G Maessen; Thomas J J Maal; Karel W E Hulsewé; Yvonne L J Vissers; Erik R de Loos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Three-dimensional surface imaging in breast cancer: a new tool for clinical studies?

Authors:  Konstantin Christoph Koban; Lucas Etzel; Zhouxiao Li; Montserrat Pazos; Stephan Schönecker; Claus Belka; Riccardo Enzo Giunta; Thilo Ludwig Schenck; Stefanie Corradini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.