| Literature DB >> 30466407 |
Fredrik Resman1,2, Guillaume Manat2, Victor Lindh2, Timothy F Murphy3, Kristian Riesbeck4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several different IgA-proteases exist in Haemophilus influenzae. The variants have been suggested to play differential roles in pathogenesis, but there is limited information on their distribution in clinical isolates. The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of IgA-protease genotypes in H. influenzae and assess the association between IgA-protease genotype and type of clinical infection.Entities:
Keywords: Genotype; Haemophilus influenzae; Human infection; IgA protease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30466407 PMCID: PMC6249890 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3464-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Cohort 1 comprising all respiratory tract isolates (n = 177). The distribution of clinical and laboratory characteristics per study year
| Culture year | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of isolates | 43 | 52 | 82 | 177 |
| 31 (72%) | 39 (75%) | 51 (62%) | 121 (68%) | |
| 14 (33%) | 29 (56%) | 20 (24%) | 63 (36%) | |
| 12 (28%) | 13 (25%) | 30 (37%) | 55 (31%) | |
| 23 (53%) | 15 (29%) | 43 (52%) | 81 (46%) | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 (1.2%) | 1 (0.6%) | |
| Age (years), mean (median) | 24 (6) | 32 (36) | 29 (34) | 29 (32) |
| Gender, % female | 53% | 67% | 55% | 58% |
| Primary care referrals, | 31 (72%) | 33 (63%) | 55 (67%) | 119 (67%) |
| Acute otitis media, | 10 (24%) | 8 (15%) | 15 (18%) | 33 (19%) |
| Sinusitis, | 5 (12%) | 5 (10%) | 11 (13%) | 21 (12%) |
| Upper respiratory tract infection, | 17 (41%) | 21 (40%) | 18 (22%) | 56 (32%) |
| Lower respiratory tract infection, | 7 (17%) | 8 (15%) | 12 (15%) | 27 (15%) |
| Unclear diagnosis from referral, | 2 (5%) | 10 (19%) | 26 (32%) | 38 (22%) |
aSome isolates have both the igaA and igaB gene, resulting in a total percentage of > 100%
The distribution of laboratory characteristics per isolation site of the 53 isolates comprising cohort 2
| Isolation site | Bloodstream | CSF | Otherb | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of isolates | 26 | 16 | 11 | 53 |
| Encapsulated | 8 | 1 | 6 | 15 |
| Nonencapsulated | 18 | 15 | 5 | 38 |
| 19 (73%) | 11 (69%) | 6 (55%) | 36 (68%) | |
| 16 (62%) | 8 (50%) | 5 (45%) | 26 (49%) | |
| 7 (27%) | 5 (31%) | 5 (45%) | 17 (32%) | |
| 1 (4%) | 4 (24%) | 3 (27%) | 8 (15%) | |
| 2 (8%) | 1 (6%) | 0 | 3 (6%) |
aSome isolates have both the igaA and igaB gene, resulting in a total percentage of > 100%
bAvailable details on all isolates are given in Additional file 1: Table S1
The iga protease gene variants among respiratory tract isolates with different properties
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (continuous, year), mean (median) | 29.4 (21) | 18.1 (4) | 33.5 (40) |
|
| Age category ( |
| |||
| > 70 years, | 5 (8%) | – | 5 (6%) | |
| 50–70 years, | 14 (22%) | 7 (13%) | 20 (25%) | |
| 20–50 years, | 15 (24%) | 14 (25%) | 27 (34%) | |
| 6–20 years, | 5 (8%) | 3 (5%) | 6 (8%) | |
| < 6 years, | 24 (38%) | 31 (56%) | 21 (27%) | |
| Gender, % female | 56% | 53% | 62% | 0.684 |
| Primary care referrals, % | 71% | 65% | 64% | 0.966 |
| Clinical diagnosis ( | 0.172 | |||
| AOM, | 11 (17%) | 13 (24%) | 13 (16%) | |
| Sinusitis, | 6 (10%) | 6 (11%) | 10 (13%) | |
| Upper respiratory tract infection, | 26 (41%) | 16 (29%) | 24 (30%) | |
| Lower respiratory tract infection, | 11 (17%) | 3 (5%) | 16 (20%) | |
| Unclear from referral, | 9 (14%) | 17 (31%) | 16 (20%) |
The Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the chi-2 test for categorical variables were used. Significant p-values are indicated in bold
Multinomial univariate and multivariate regressions with clinical diagnosis as the outcome (URTI was used as base category)
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| Covariate | Beta-coefficient (95% CI), | Beta-coefficient (95% CI), |
| Age | AOM vs URTI −0.087 (−0.13 - (−0.044)), | AOM vs URTI - 0.091 (− 0.14 – (− 0.047), |
| Sepsis vs URTI − 1.69 (−3.00 – (− 0.38)), | Sepsis vs URTI −1.86 (−3.22- (− 0.49)), | |
| no significant category |
The analysis was performed for isolates with igaB genotype vs all other isolates as well as those with igaA2 genotype vs all other isolates. Only statistically significant associations are presented
Fig. 1Sequential genotyping used to identify the different iga alleles