| Literature DB >> 30464940 |
Jumeng Wei1,2, Min Zhou3, Anchun Long2, Yanming Xue4, Hanbin Liao5,6, Chao Wei5,6, Zhichuan J Xu7,8,9,10.
Abstract
The hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is a half-cell reaction inEntities:
Keywords: Hybrid catalyst; Hydrogen production; Interface engineering; Synergistic effect; Water splitting
Year: 2018 PMID: 30464940 PMCID: PMC6223891 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-018-0229-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Scheme 1Schematic pathways for hydrogen evolution reaction under acidic and alkaline conditions
Fig. 1a STM image (60 nm × 60 nm) and CV trace of the Pt/Ni(OH)2 surface. b Comparison of HER activities of Ni(OH)2-modified Pt electrode and control samples in 0.1 M KOH. c Schematic representation of water dissociation, formation of M–Had intermediates, and subsequent recombination of two Had atoms to form H2 (magenta arrow), as well as OH− desorption from the Ni(OH)2 domains (red arrows) followed by adsorption of another water molecule on the same site (blue arrows). Reproduced with permission of the authors of Ref. [15]. Copyright 2011, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (Color figure online)
Fig. 2a Schematic of synthesis of Pt NWs/SL–Ni(OH)2. b, c TEM images of Pt NWs/SL–Ni(OH)2; scale bars in b and c are 100 and 5 nm, respectively. HER activity of Pt NWs/SL–Ni(OH)2, Pt NPs/SL–Ni(OH)2, pure Pt NWs, and commercial Pt/C (20 wt% Pt) in 1 M d and 0.1 M KOH e at room temperature. Reproduced with permission of the authors of Ref. [35]. Copyright 2015, Nature Publishing Group
Fig. 3TEM images and EDS elemental mapping of Pd/FeO(OH)2−2 NPs a, b before cycling and c, d after 1000 electrochemical cycles. The scale bar is 5 nm. e Schematic diagram of the alkaline HER reaction process on the surface of core/shell Pd/FeO(OH)2−2 nanoparticles after electrochemical cycling. f iR-corrected linear sweep voltammogram (LSV) curves. g Turnover frequencies (TOFs) of Pd/FeO(OH)2−2 NPs and catalysts in the benchmark literature: Pd/C, Pd-CN, Ni-MoS2, and CoP. h HER activity versus FeO(OH)2−2 coverage [40]. Copyright 2017, Wiley–VCH
Fig. 4a ECSA-normalized polarization curves (symbols) of bare MoS2 and MoS2/NiCo-LDH composite catalysts in 1 M KOH solution with the best fits (lines) using the dual-pathway kinetic model. The fitted standard activation free energies are presented in units of meV. b Free energy diagram of the dominant Volmer–Heyrovsky pathway for HER in alkaline electrolyte for bare MoS2 (blue) and MoS2/NiCo-LDH composite (red) catalysts. c Schematic illustration of the HER at MoS2/LDH interface in alkaline environment. Synergistic chemisorption of H (on MoS2) and OH (on LDH) for enhancing the water dissociation step. Reproduced with permission of the authors of Ref. [44]. Copyright 2017, Cell Press. (Color figure online)
Fig. 5a Free energies of H2O adsorption, H adsorption, and H2 evolution on α- or β-Ni(OH)2/Pt electrode; for clarity, the adsorbed H atoms for the H2O molecules in the top site on the Pt surfaces are colored green. b Adsorption free energy diagram for the Volmer and Heyrovsky steps. c LDOS of the α- or β-Ni(OH)2/Pt electrode. Reproduced with permission of the authors of Ref. [53]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (Color figure online)
Fig. 6a High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of Ni3N@CQDs, b O K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of Ni3N@CQDs, commercial NiO and the CQDs treated in NH3 at 370 °C, c linear scan voltammetry (LSV) polarization curves of Ni3N@CQDs in comparison with those of platinum (Pt) electrode, pristine Ni3N, CQDs, and glassy carbon (GC) electrode in a 1 M KOH aqueous solution. Comparison of HER Volmer reaction step and the resultant binding energies on carbon-coated Ni3N(110) d and pristine Ni3N(110) e surfaces. N, Ni, C, O, and H atoms are indicated by blue, gray, brown, red, and cyan, respectively. Reproduced with permission of the authors of Ref. [54]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (Color figure online)
Performance of reported heterostructured catalysts for HER in alkaline medium
| Catalysts | Electrolyte | Substrate | Overpotential (current density by electrode surface area) | Overpotential (current density by catalyst surface area) | Pt content | Tafel slope (mV dec−1) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiO | 1 M KOH | GCEa | 70 mV@19.8 mA cm−2 | N/A | 15.3 μg cm−2 | N/A | [ |
| Pt–Ni/NiS | 1 M KOH | GCE | 70 mV@37.2 mA cm−2 | N/A | 15.3 μg cm−2 | N/A | [ |
| Pt nanowires/SL-Ni(OH)2 | 1 M KOH | GCE | 70 mV@10.9 mA cm−2 | 70 mV@2.48 mA cm−2 | 38 wt% | N/A | [ |
| 0.1 M KOH | 70 mV@25.2 mA cm−2 | 70 mV@6.31 mA cm−2 | |||||
| Pt nanocrystals @2D-Ni(OH)2 | 0.1 M KOH | GCE | 100 mV@5 mA cm−2 | N/A | 43 wt% | 72 | [ |
| Ni(OH)2–Pt/C | 0.1 M KOH | GCE | 157 mV@5 mA cm−2 | N/A | 20 wt% | N/A | [ |
| Ni3N/Pt | 1 M KOH | Ni Foam | 160 mV@200 mA cm−2 | N/A | 15 wt% | 36.5 | [ |
| Pt–Co(OH)2 | 1 M KOH | Carbon Cloth | 32 mV@10 mA cm−2 | 200 mV@3 mA cm−2 | 5.7 wt% | 70 | [ |
| PtO2–Co(OH)F | 0.1 M KOH | Ti mesh | 39 mV@4 mA cm−2 | 100 mV@145 μA cm−2 | 4.8 wt% | 63 | [ |
| PtO2–CoOOH | 1 M KOH | Ti mesh | 14 mV@10 mA cm−2 | N/A | N/A | 39 | [ |
| Pd/FeO | 0.1 M KOH | GCE | 280 mV@5 mA cm−2 | 150 mV@0.1 mA cm−2 | N/A | 131–162 | [ |
aGCE Glassy carbon electrode
bCFP Carbon fiber paper