Literature DB >> 3046484

Comparative study of cephalexin hydrochloride and cephalexin monohydrate in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.

A Kumar1, D L Murray, C B Hanna, T G Kreindler, K D Jacobson, J M Bundy, K Waxman, E F Finnerty, D W Folan, W R Drucker.   

Abstract

In two prospective, randomized multicenter double-blind studies with a dosage of either 250 mg given four times a day (study A) or 500 mg given two times a day (study B), the comparative efficacy and safety of cephalexin hydrochloride (LY061188; Keftab) and cephalexin monohydrate (Keflex) for treatment of skin and soft tissue infections were determined. In study A, 97 patients received cephalexin hydrochloride and 101 patients received cephalexin monohydrate. In study B, 75 patients received cephalexin hydrochloride and 70 patients received cephalexin monohydrate. Diagnoses included abscesses, cellulitis, wound infections, and infected dermatitis, and were comparable in the different treatment groups. Pathogens were isolated from 82% of patients enrolled; the majority of isolates were of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, other staphylococcal species, and a few gram-negative bacteria. In study A, 68 of 71 (95.7%) evaluable patients who received cephalexin hydrochloride responded satisfactorily; 73 of 81 (90%) patients who received cephalexin monohydrate also responded satisfactorily. In study B, 56 of 58 (96.5%) evaluable patients who received cephalexin hydrochloride responded satisfactorily; 47 of 50 (94%) patients who received cephalexin monohydrate also responded satisfactorily. An adverse clinical event leading to discontinuation of the treatment drug developed in 17 of 343 (4.95%) patients in both studies. No differences were noted between the two drugs. Skin eruptions, pruritus, and mild gastrointestinal symptoms were the common adverse effects. These data suggest that cephalexin hydrochloride, a new formulation of cephalexin, is a safe and effective antimicrobial agent for treatment of a variety of skin and subcutaneous infections in a dosage of either 250 mg four times a day or 500 mg twice a day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3046484      PMCID: PMC172300          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.32.6.882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

Review 1.  Antibacterial therapy.

Authors:  D S Feingold; R F Wagner
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 2.  Antimicrobial treatment of minor soft tissue lacerations: a critical review.

Authors:  R F Edlich; J G Kenney; R F Morgan; L S Nichter; H I Friedman; G T Rodeheaver
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Efficacy of two dosage schedules of cephalexin in dermatologic infections.

Authors:  A F DiMattia; M J Sexton; C R Smialowicz; W H Knapp
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Practical aspects of bacterial skin infections in children.

Authors:  W W Tunnessen
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections: a comparison of cephalexin and dicloxacillin.

Authors:  H C Dillon
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Skin and soft tissue infections: pharmacologic approaches.

Authors:  J L Blumer; C A O'Brien; E Lemon; T M Capretta
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1985 May-Jun

7.  Quantitative comparison of adverse reactions to cefaclor vs. amoxicillin in a surveillance study.

Authors:  L R Levine
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  The role of cephalexin in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  C W Derrick; K Reilly
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Overview of bacterial infections of the skin and soft tissue and clinical experience with ticarcillin plus clavulanate potassium in their treatment.

Authors:  G A Pankey; H P Katner; G T Valainis; M J Clarkson; L M Cortez; J R Dalovisio
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-11-29       Impact factor: 4.965

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for impetigo.

Authors:  Sander Koning; Renske van der Sande; Arianne P Verhagen; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Andrew D Morris; Christopher C Butler; Marjolein Berger; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.