Literature DB >> 30464796

Analysis of Real-World Dosing Patterns for the 3 FDA-Approved Medications in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia.

Craig White1, Winghan Jacqueline Kwong2, Hilary Armstrong3, Michael Behling4, Jeffrey Niemira5, Kathy Lang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances that affects approximately 2% to 4% of the adult population in the United States, with minimal real-world data related to the use of medications and associated dosages for this condition.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the real-world dosing patterns of the 3 medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for fibromyalgia-pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran.
METHODS: Using QuintilesIMS' (now IQVIA) electronic medical record data linked to administrative claims, we identified adults with fibromyalgia who were newly prescribed pregabalin, duloxetine, or milnacipran between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014. We summarized and compared the starting and maximum doses with United States prescribing information (USPI) dosing recommendations.
RESULTS: In all, 1043 patients who were receiving pregabalin, 1281 receiving duloxetine, and 326 patients receiving milnacipran with similar age and comorbidity profiles were included in the study. The mean starting dose was 176 mg daily, 56 mg daily, and 95 mg daily for pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran, respectively. More patients receiving pregabalin (35%) had a starting dose lower than recommended compared with patients receiving duloxetine (7%) or milnacipran (17%; P <.0001). Of the patients who received pregabalin, 27% had USPI-recommended maintenance dosing versus 91% of patients who received duloxetine and 80% who received milnacipran (P <.0001). The mean duration of treatment was longer for duloxetine (205 days; P <.0001) than for pregabalin (167 days) and milnacipran (167 days). The duration of using the maximum dose of each medication as a percentage of the total time of medication use was 77% for pregabalin, 84% for duloxetine, and 90% for milnacipran (P <.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients using pregabalin were the most likely of the 3 cohorts to receive lower than label-recommended starting doses and the least likely to receive the recommended maintenance doses during follow-up compared with those receiving duloxetine or milnacipran. Real-world prescribing patterns indicate that factors other than label recommendations may be influencing prescribed dosing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dosing patterns; duloxetine; fibromyalgia; milnacipran; pregabalin; recommended dose; treatment duration

Year:  2018        PMID: 30464796      PMCID: PMC6207316     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits        ISSN: 1942-2962


  16 in total

1.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Average daily dose, medication adherence, and healthcare costs among commercially-insured patients with fibromyalgia treated with duloxetine.

Authors:  N Wu; S Chen; L Boulanger; P Rao; Y Zhao
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and healthcare costs among patients with fibromyalgia newly prescribed pregabalin or duloxetine in usual care.

Authors:  Mugdha Gore; Kei-Sing Tai; Arthi Chandran; Gergana Zlateva; Douglas Leslie
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 4.  The use of opioids in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Gene-Siew Ngian; Emma K Guymer; Geoffrey O Littlejohn
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 5.  Comparative efficacy and harms of duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin in fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Frank Petzke; Claudia Sommer
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Prevalence of fibromyalgia: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, utilizing the Rochester Epidemiology Project.

Authors:  Ann Vincent; Brian D Lahr; Frederick Wolfe; Daniel J Clauw; Mary O Whipple; Terry H Oh; Debra L Barton; Jennifer St Sauver
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Clinical characteristics and medication uses among fibromyalgia patients newly prescribed amitriptyline, duloxetine, gabapentin, or pregabalin.

Authors:  Seoyoung C Kim; Joan E Landon; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  Fibromyalgia: a clinical review.

Authors:  Daniel J Clauw
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Longitudinal observation of treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia: 12-month findings from the reflections study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Robinson; Kurt Kroenke; David A Williams; Philip Mease; Yi Chen; Douglas Faries; Xiaomei Peng; Danette Hann; Madelaine Wohlreich; Bill McCarberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Treatment Patterns Associated with ACR-Recommended Medications in the Management of Fibromyalgia in the United States.

Authors:  Yifei Liu; Chunlin Qian; Mei Yang
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.