Literature DB >> 30464017

Immediate bronchodilator response in FEV1 as a diagnostic criterion for adult asthma.

Leena E Tuomisto1, Pinja Ilmarinen1, Lauri Lehtimäki2,3, Minna Tommola1, Hannu Kankaanranta1,2.   

Abstract

Asthma is characterised by variable and reversible expiratory airflow limitations. Thus, it is logical to use the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in response to a bronchodilator (ΔFEV1BDR) as a diagnostic tool; increases of ≥12% and ≥200 mL from the baseline FEV1 are commonly used values. We aimed to evaluate the historical development of diagnostic cut-off levels for the ΔFEV1BDR for adults and the evidence behind these recommendations.We searched for studies from the reference lists of all the main statements, reports and guidelines concerning the interpretation of spirometry and diagnostics for asthma and conducted a literature search.A limited amount of evidence regarding the ΔFEV1BDR in healthy populations was found, and even fewer patient studies were found. In healthy persons, the upper 95th percentile for the absolute ΔFEV1BDR ranges between 240 mL and 320 mL, the relative ΔFEV1BDR calculated from the initial FEV1 ranges from 5.9% to 13.3% and the ΔFEV1BDR calculated from the predicted FEV1 ranges from 8.7% to 11.6%. However, the absolute and percentage ΔFEV1BDR values calculated from the initial FEV1 are dependent on age, sex, height and the degree of airway obstruction. Thus, the use of the ΔFEV1BDR calculated from the predicted FEV1 might be more appropriate.Not enough data exist to assess the sensitivity of any of the cut-off levels for the ΔFEV1BDR to differentiate asthma patients from healthy subjects. Further studies in newly diagnosed asthma patients are needed.
Copyright ©ERS 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30464017     DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00904-2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  4 in total

1.  Bronchodilator reversibility as a diagnostic test for adult asthma: findings from the population-based Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study.

Authors:  Daniel J Tan; Caroline J Lodge; Adrian J Lowe; Dinh S Bui; Gayan Bowatte; David P Johns; Garun S Hamilton; Paul S Thomas; Michael J Abramson; E Haydn Walters; Jennifer L Perret; Shyamali C Dharmage
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-02-08

2.  Clinical value of bronchodilator response for diagnosing asthma in steroid-naïve adults.

Authors:  Leena E Tuomisto; Pinja Ilmarinen; Lauri Lehtimäki; Onni Niemelä; Minna Tommola; Hannu Kankaanranta
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-12-13

3.  Asthma Diagnosis without Aerosol-Generating Procedures (Spirometry): Evidence for and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hannu Kankaanranta; Lauri Lehtimäki; Leena E Tuomisto
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2021-12

4.  Screening tools for work-related asthma and their diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Ngamjit Kongsupon; Gareth I Walters; Peymané Adab; Rachel E Jordan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.